A couple questions about some of the reffereeing yesterday
#1
Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:45 PM
I have had a little trouble finding out the answer to two questions:
1) How do you pick up a flag for holding?? That seems like something that isn't really up for interpretation. Either someone held or they didn't. I guess my question is, is there a way that a hold suddenly becomes not a hold?
2) When Martin fumbled in the end zone shouldn't have Tampa had to challenge that?? The new rule, as I understand it, is that all scoring plays are reviewed by the officials. However, on that play it wasn't a scoring play. It was a fumble that was recovered by Carolina for a touchback. So my question is, shouldn't have Tampa had to throw the red flag in order to review that play, and since the play was upheld shouldn't they have lost a timeout??
Can someone explain these to me? Am I missing something that I should know about?
#2
Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:47 PM
#3
Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:47 PM
All turnovers are reviewed as well.
#4
Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:48 PM
If you saw it, you saw it... and I'm pretty sure that it was the referee that threw that flag, not the back or side judge...
Overall the officiating has been poor this season and not just in our opponents favor, and not just in our games...
I believe that the Martin play was in fact a TD and the official got it wrong, but there wasn't enough video evidence to change it. idk why it was reviewed... did Tampa not throw the red flag?
#5
Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:54 PM
#1 still baffles me though
#6
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:19 PM
#7
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:21 PM
I'm baffled at the clock controller in some of these games. (SNF last night to be specific). There were other games where I was baffled the clock wasn't running.
#8
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:23 PM
To be fair though, we very much recouped that penalty with the fumble that wasn't in the end zone.
#9
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:23 PM
Holding is not binary by the way. There is some degree of holding on practically every play. It's judgment of the refs often. Kind of like pass interference. Plenty of times where it could go either way.
#10
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:24 PM
#11
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:27 PM
And another thing. The topcats had way to much cloth yesterday.
[/oldmanrant]
#12
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:34 PM
#13
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:41 PM
In our case it looked more like our guy was hamming it up a bit to make a borderline block look like a hold. What I saw on the replay would have been a pretty ticky-tak holding call.
#14
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:52 PM
#15
Posted 19 November 2012 - 06:10 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





