Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

John Gruden and QB development

33 posts in this topic

Posted

One of the big arguments I keep hearing against John Gruden as the Panther's next coach has been:

"Name one QB John Gruden has developed. Just ONE!!!"

Now I don't really want Gruden as our next coach but I think this line of thinking is a bit off base. To me, it comes down to what your definition of "developing a QB" is.

For example, Rich Gannon was an average at best QB and mostly a backup in Minnesota and Kansas City for 11 seasons.

In 1999 Gannon and Gruden team up in Oakland and then Gannon goes on to win an MVP award (2002), goes to 4 straight Pro Bowls (1999-2002), has 3 All-Pro selections (2000-2002), and 3 AFC player of the year awards (2000-2002).

Brad Johnson went to Tampa Bay after being basically dropped by Minnesota and Washington.

He had a very average year in 2001 with Tampa Bay. In 2002 with Gruden he suddenly becomes a Pro Bowler, leads the league in INT% and becomes a Super Bowl winning QB.

Now, I am not sure what some of your guys definition of "developing a QB" is. If you mean a guy he drafted and developed into a Pro Bowler I guess you would be correct. I don't look at it that way.

Something has to be said about a guy who took QBs that were average or even bad QBs that had been dropped by other organizations and then developing them into MVP QBs, Pro Bowlers, and Super Bowl winning QBs.

If he came here to Carolina he wouldn't have to draft a QB. He has a QB. He would just have to develop him the same way he did Gannon and Johnson.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If you want a QB developer look at Tom Clements (and not just the job he did with the packers, either)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

so many metrics go into the success of a football team that it makes it extremely difficult to examine the skills of a particular coach based on W/L percentages and individual performances. they're definitely good indicators, but not precise. how does one factor in, say, the team left behind by the previous front office? there are people who say gruden fell into a situation where dungy did all the dirty work building the team's core talent and all gruden had to do was come in and hold the steering wheel straight, and once he got to the point of having to build the team on his own and sustain success he repeatedly failed.

i'm not on the 'gruden would be a turrible coach' train by any means but there's a lot more to look at when analyzing a coach's influence on success. correlation =/= causation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

a lot of good QBs are a by-product of the system....kinda wonder what would have happened with Brady if he went to the Browns...or Detroit...guess we'll never know. Gruden is a good x and o's coach with a minor in psychology...he can motivate you but he might break u.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Tampa's defense won that game. Johnson was basically tampa's Trent Dilfer.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

so many metrics go into the success of a football team that it makes it extremely difficult to examine the skills of a particular coach based on W/L percentages and individual performances. they're definitely good indicators, but not precise. how does one factor in, say, the team left behind by the previous front office? there are people who say gruden fell into a situation where dungy did all the dirty work building the team's core talent and all gruden had to do was come in and hold the steering wheel straight, and once he got to the point of having to build the team on his own and sustain success he repeatedly failed.

i'm not on the 'gruden would be a turrible coach' train by any means but there's a lot more to look at when analyzing a coach's influence on success. correlation =/= causation.

That is true but in 2001 with Dungy Tampa Bay was 9-7 and in 2002 with Gruden they jump to 12-4.

Johnson went from being very average in 2001 to being a Pro Bowler in 2002 and winning a Super Bowl.

In 2003 Johnson had a rough year (26 TDs and 21 INTs) and was the scapegoat for a 7-9 season. He was replaced the next season and Tampa Bay never had another QB with any real talent the rest of Gruden's tenure (Simms, Griese, Gradkowski, and Garcia). I mean Garcia was decent, and Tampa went 18-14 with him at QB, but the other 3 QBs no coach would have won with. Those QBs had no talent to develop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Tampa's defense won that game. Johnson was basically tampa's Trent Dilfer.

The defense may have won that Super Bowl game. But Johnson was a Pro Bowler and had the best INT% in the NFL that season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

his team hated him because he was an arrogant confrontational prick with an ego the size of alaska.

do

not

want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

oh...and what has he done since 2002?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He took Dungy's Bucs to the basement in record time.

Do not want.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

how many non-juco teams have wanted him since he got fired from tampa?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He has a great gig right now, but to say he is not wanted and not proven is completely inaccurate. His Raiders team made it to the Superbowl against his new Bucs team. He won the game. So, basically he developed one team and won with another. He is a great coach Denying that is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites