Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

OJ and the serial killer


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#21 FuzzyPanther

FuzzyPanther

    ...feeling sexy as usual

  • Joined: 02-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 434
  • Reputation: 33
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 12:19 AM

Some white trash in a trailer park beating his ex-wife/sister has what to do with OJ's case, exactly?


Everything. Domestic violence transcends race, religion, ethnic and socio-economic boundries. It is the most predictable type of violence/homicide there is. (Source below)

Suggested reading: "The Gift of Fear", Gavin de Becker.

#22 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 12:36 AM

Everything. Domestic violence transcends race, religion, ethnic and socio-economic boundries. It is the most predictable type of violence/homicide there is. (Source below)

Suggested reading: "The Gift of Fear", Gavin de Becker.


OK I'll play too. Most African American males accused of murder are accused of murdering other African American males.

"predictability" has nothing to do with this murder case.

#23 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 12:40 AM

I'm telling you that outside of the DNA evidence it was obvioius he did it. What about the 911 call? Did Fuhrman make that up?


Which 911 call?

#24 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 16-May 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 954
  • Reputation: 79
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:08 AM

Which 911 call?


The one where a terrified Nicole asks the operator to please send the cops because OJ is coming after her again and you can hear OJ screaming at her in the background. That made it into the trial, didn't it? Or was that just played for people outside the trial?

#25 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 03:36 AM

It made it to trial, I believe. So, let me get this straight. I'm thinking that 911 call was in 1989. I don't remember. They were married three more years. In 1992 they were divorced. In 1994, OJ, with nude paintings of his current girlfriend on his wall, suddenly rages over a fight several years earlier, and decides to kill her?

Analyze their marriage until you turn blue. We all know there was a reason for the divorce. The trial was about her murder, not their marriage.

What, in your mind, puts OJ at the scene, killing two people? A fight 5 years earlier?

#26 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 16-May 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 954
  • Reputation: 79
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:30 PM

It made it to trial, I believe. So, let me get this straight. I'm thinking that 911 call was in 1989. I don't remember. They were married three more years. In 1992 they were divorced. In 1994, OJ, with nude paintings of his current girlfriend on his wall, suddenly rages over a fight several years earlier, and decides to kill her?

Analyze their marriage until you turn blue. We all know there was a reason for the divorce. The trial was about her murder, not their marriage.

What, in your mind, puts OJ at the scene, killing two people? A fight 5 years earlier?


Then why was he running? He intuitively knew she was just killed by a serial killer and wanted to get away before he got killed, too?

#27 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:38 PM

Running at 35mph, straight to a relative's home, where he told police to meet him.

#28 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:40 PM

If everyone is so sure of his guilt, then why are there only questions of things that happened years prior, or the day of his high speed 35 MPH chase to where he told police to meet him?

Why no questions about the night she was murdered?

#29 logic1977

logic1977

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 413
  • Reputation: 68
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:37 PM

I'd really be interested in a re-examination of this case.

DurIng the original trial DNA evidence wasn't understood the way it is now and the trial was must see TV with lines drawn. You had to choose your camp and that colored your opinion on the evidence.

Just from a curiosity standpoint I'd love to go through it all again.

No doubt he may have had all the motive in the world. Doesn't mean he did it. I've also heard people say there was tons of DNA linking him to the crime scene, but I've personally never read anything to substantiate that.

#30 KBRed

KBRed

    Scooter Swag

  • Joined: 25-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,076
  • Reputation: 289
HUDDLER

Posted 23 November 2012 - 06:05 AM

This, my friend, is called media sensationalism. Do some reading into what was really going on. OJ had spoken to the police earlier that day. He agreed to turn himself in after he speaks with family. A 35 MPH trip to a family members house with police following isn't a chase; it's an escort.


Quite the presidential escort...

Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users