Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Elmo=homosexual pedophile. Resigns when 2nd accusor comes forward

107 posts in this topic

Posted

Um if they met on a gay sex chat line with an age restriction of 18, shouldn't the chat line be the ones being sued for allowing a 15 year old on it? Someone should be able to get on those with peace of mind that the company isn't setting them up with kids.

how is a website supposed to monitor that? most of the time you just click a "yes, i am 18 or older" button and you're in. what realistic metrics can be put in place to stop an underage person from entering?

it is an interesting point though. was the age of the 15-year-old communicated at the time of the meeting? if so that would trump any blame placed on the social medium because the alleged perp knew exactly what he was dealing with at that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

how is a website supposed to monitor that? most of the time you just click a "yes, i am 18 or older" button and you're in. what realistic metrics can be put in place to stop an underage person from entering?

it is an interesting point though. was the age of the 15-year-old communicated at the time of the meeting? if so that would trump any blame placed on the social medium because the alleged perp knew exactly what he was dealing with at that point.

It wasn't a website, it was a telephone chat line. I guess his parents weren't curious about the gay sex line charges on the phone bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It wasn't a website, it was a telephone chat line. I guess his parents weren't curious about the gay sex line charges on the phone bill.

ahh my bad. still, how would they verify?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Off the top of my head, by requiring membership and approval. I'm certain that in their advertisements they make note that it's 18+. If you are putting a product out there and saying "This is a place for adults to meet for sexual activities" then I definitely think there is an onus with the company to make sure that is in fact the case. Brothels do it, strip clubs do it, is it unreasonable that sex lines do it?

If you order a steak in a restaurant, and they bring it out and you eat it, then find out that it was pork, does that make you a bad jew? Or should the restaurant have made sure they were serving what was advertised?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Man, there sure are a lot of ifs, ands or buts here.

Who cares what political, religious, ethnic or funding origins were in any situation. If a guy/gal breaks the law and messes with someone underage, all the other crap is just that, crap.

Christion, catholic, black, white, puppeteer or congressman, put them away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

BTW I'd like to point out that the word "homosexual" is irrelevant to this topic and, as such, shouldn't even be in the title...

Sexual preference does not contribute to the accusations of pedophilia, and to insinuate such nonsense by including the word in the title is nothing more than a subtle attempt to get a knee jerk reaction from people's subconscious and perpetuate your uneducated opinion...

Veiled bigotry is still bigotry...

/signed by an absolutely straight man that is disgusted by the perpetual discrimination of people because of an innate sexual preference

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Meat assured me it's p. difficult to tell how old the operators working for a gay phone sex company are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So who is the victim here? Or dog gone it because there isn't a choice nobody can be held accountable? I'm gonna use that with the IRS. Yeah guys sorry I haven't paid you. Its in my dna not to follow thru so you can't blame me.

I hope none of this is true but wow do we downplay some wacky junk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If it's proven that he actually did something, nobody will be downplaying it. Until then, I'll go by my "gut feeling" that it's a BS accusation like a lot of "Oh, me too!" accusers end up being.

Or did you change your mind and we can't go by "feelings" now?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

two scenarios where bits of info have come in. the first one to me, stacked up quite nicely as not passing the smell test. no biases involved.

the second one is not as clear and im hopeful none of its true for both parties involved sake.

if you have never had gut instincts about things or a hunch then i suggest you let go of trying to be Data.

gobble gobble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Meat assured me it's p. difficult to tell how old the operators working for a gay phone sex company are.

Meat just wanted you to leave the room so he could commence to servicing your mom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Bumping this thread to update that every single case against Clash has been thrown out of court, and appeals court, as baseless. The accuser this thread was about admitted he lied, and the last of the subsequent money-grubbers have just lost their appeals.

 

Can never restore his name, though. To most people he'll forever be "homosexual pedophile."

 

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites