Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Elmo=homosexual pedophile. Resigns when 2nd accusor comes forward


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
106 replies to this topic

#25 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:45 PM

?

you'll have to walk me through how you made that connection


Here you go..

http://www.breitbart...-sex-allegation

look at the comments. took five second of google.

#26 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,267
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:46 PM

I got my story from Yahoo...you have to understand the commentary is going to be all over the place.

Does that change anything regarding this dude?

#27 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:49 PM

I got my story from Yahoo...you have to understand the commentary is going to be all over the place.

Does that change anything regarding this dude?


It does. I don't want the dude's life ruined because of political/guilty until proven innocent bullsh*t

#28 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,389
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:56 PM

Here you go..

http://www.breitbart...-sex-allegation

look at the comments. took five second of google.


i expect snark from every conceivable outlet with respect to individual commentary, not the news outlet itself (though the editor may absolutely pick and choose said commentary to their own ends). i put no more stock in it than your insinuation.

the only reason the title references elmo rather than kevin clash is because people generally know the occupation rather than the man

#29 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:59 PM

i expect snark from every conceivable outlet with respect to individual commentary, not the news outlet itself (though the editor may absolutely pick and choose said commentary to their own ends). i put no more stock in it than your insinuation.

the only reason the title references elmo rather than kevin clash is because people generally know the occupation rather than the man


ok, whatever you win. no one will ever use this to attack SS and government spending.

anywho


#30 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,389
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:00 PM

It does. I don't want the dude's life ruined because of political/guilty until proven innocent bullsh*t


celebrity pedophile stories have been going strong regardless of political affilliation for the last two decades now. i think you are right to be skeptical of the veracity of said claims. that said, i wouldn't allow my 8 year old son to spend the night as his place for a sleepover party

#31 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,389
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:01 PM

ok, whatever you win. no one will ever use this to attack SS and government spending.

anywho


you made the assertion. don't start nuthin,.....

#32 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:10 PM

you made the assertion. don't start nuthin,.....


assertions lol

ELMO IS A PEDOPHILE THIS TOTALLY PROVES IT OMFG

#33 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:14 PM

i expect snark from every conceivable outlet with respect to individual commentary, not the news outlet itself (though the editor may absolutely pick and choose said commentary to their own ends). i put no more stock in it than your insinuation.


Wait a sec. Of course I was talking about commentators. They still work for the news outlets don't they?

#34 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,389
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:21 PM

assertions lol

ELMO IS A PEDOPHILE THIS TOTALLY PROVES IT OMFG

Posted Image

#35 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,389
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:22 PM

Wait a sec. Of course I was talking about commentators. They still work for the news outlets don't they?


does it hurt?

#36 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,561
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:32 PM

Posted Image


Well this would explain your posts.

Interesting that your biggest beef is with me saying something true about rightwingers and not g5's assertions.

Stop humping every post I make.