Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Hey NCAA....lol....

10 posts in this topic

Posted

http://sports.yahoo....61QZmkATDvQtDMD

The NCAA was ''malicious'' in its investigation of a former Southern California assistant football coach who was linked in a report to a scandal surrounding Heisman Trophy-winning tailback Reggie Bush, a judge said Wednesday.

The NCAA's report on ethical breaches by Todd McNair was flawed, and the former coach has shown a probability he can win his defamation claims, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Frederick Shaller said.

The NCAA had sought to have the case dismissed, but Shaller disagreed. He said after reviewing sealed documents in the McNair inquiry, which was tied to a gift scandal involving Heisman Trophy-winner Reggie Bush, he was convinced that the actions of NCAA investigators were ''over the top.''

His ruling states emails between an investigative committee member, an NCAA worker and a person who works in the agency's appeals division ''tend to show ill will or hatred'' toward McNair.

This is the difference in what those clowns call evidence, and what actually is in fact evidence.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Just because you don't give a poo doesn't mean this isn't possibly HUGE as far as the NCAA infractions committee and their corruption goes. Sorry that you don't understand that....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's pretty irrelevant, C47. Reggie Bush has been gone 6 years. No one cares about him anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the crickets post said it best

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This isn't just about the Reggie Bush situation. The point of this is that it shows the NCAA Infractions Committee isn't exactly fair in its investigation of school's alleged violations. There seems to be some ulterior motive when they decide to investigate.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This isn't just about the Reggie Bush situation. The point of this is that it shows the NCAA Infractions Committee isn't exactly fair in its investigation of school's alleged violations. There seems to be some ulterior motive when they decide to investigate.

...and it has always been this way. I mean really, UNC got 1 year of post-season ban...seriously...should've been no less than 2 or 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's pretty irrelevant, C47. Reggie Bush has been gone 6 years. No one cares about him anymore.

I'm sorry that you can't see that this is more important than Bush, or USC. This is about the NCAA's corruption, not one particular case.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

...and it has always been this way. I mean really, UNC got 1 year of post-season ban...seriously...should've been no less than 2 or 3.

Actually UNC should have had no postseason ban, That was a bullpoo ruling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/dennis-dodd/21162720/documents-appear-to-show-improper-ncaa-involvement-in-usc-case

Documents that the NCAA is aggressively trying to keep under seal appear to show improper involvement by NCAA staff and committee members in the landmark USC decision more than two years ago.

A judge's decision made public last week – and obtained in full by CBSSports.com -- shows that at least three persons may have improperly tried to influence the NCAA's powerful infractions committee to find former USC assistant Todd McNair complicit in the Reggie Bush case. Lawyers for McNair are trying to show the association violated its own rules and procedures in investigating their client.

Two non-voting members of the NCAA infractions committee and NCAA staffer allegedly tried to influence voting members inside the 10-person committee. The judge's decision contains excerpts of emails that he has determined show “ill will or hatred” toward McNair.

I know, it's irrelevant....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites