Jump to content


- - - - -

Cam Newtons Strengths ?


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

#31 Eazy-E

Eazy-E

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,573
  • Reputation: 498
  • LocationCharleston, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:20 PM

never said, nor do i want the team to give up on him.

i just don't believe he will be as good as people think he will be.

carolina can win with him, just like any team can win with any decent qb (49ers with alex smith is a perfect example). but it won't happen until the coaching staff opens their eyes.

it's like watching an amateur chess player forget about all the other chess pieces and try to only play with the queen.


He already proved he can be very very good. What do you have that proves your side of the argument besides personal feelings. DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart are both excellent running backs and have proven so but are both putting up terrible numbers. I guess they are both on the decline and will never be as good as people say they are.

#32 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,770
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:21 PM

the panthers need a coaching staff who's first and only focus is winning regardless of who may or may not be a future nfl star is on the team.

#33 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,770
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:24 PM

He already proved he can be very very good. What do you have that proves your side of the argument besides personal feelings. DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart are both excellent running backs and have proven so but are both putting up terrible numbers. I guess they are both on the decline and will never be as good as people say they are.


...aaaaaaand. here. we. go.

#34 Eazy-E

Eazy-E

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,573
  • Reputation: 498
  • LocationCharleston, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:35 PM

And since you mentioned the chess analogy, you obviously know the coaching is a major problem. You know the true potential of a Queen and and mention the failure of the chess player and the misuse of the queen. Just wanted to point out a flawed analogy.

#35 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • Joined: 10-January 11
  • posts: 16,901
  • Reputation: 8,793
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 03:25 PM

I would have to say his number one strength is his ( by all accounts anyway) strong work ethic. I dont see superior arm strength as being all that important to be a winning NFL qb.


Since u seem to already have all to have all the answers why did u even start this thread??

#36 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • posts: 2,969
  • Reputation: 1,501
  • LocationSan Diego
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:18 PM

Haters are gonna hate. When we win the SB in two years, what will they hate on? They will find something. In the meantime, try not to feed their horrible rants.

#37 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
  • LocationSouthern California
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:26 PM

Haters are gonna hate. When we win the SB in two years, what will they hate on? They will find something. In the meantime, try not to feed their horrible rants.


I can hear thegreatestofalltimecam now...

"Waaaaahhhh I don't like our rings and I wish we would've worn the all blacks during the Super Bowl.."

#38 TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

    Cam Nut Hugger

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,637
  • Reputation: 953
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:53 PM

"Cam will appear to improve again"

LOL!!!!! Did he "appear to improve" last year when he was demolishing records as a rookie? Some people just don't get it. You deserve Mark Sanchez or Brandon Weeden as your QB... what whine babys

#39 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,749
  • Reputation: 2,219
HUDDLER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:17 PM

He's tall, has a strong arm, and is driven to succeed.

#40 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    DeAngelo Williams/Steve Smith Huddle: Est 2003

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,635
  • Reputation: 5,037
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:39 PM

Well I can't speak for you, but for me I think hate is really a kind word that doesn't really capture how I feel.

Not only did I have to stand through another 2 shitty seasons, after suffering 2 previous ones, arguing with Caminions and listen to Newtonian football philosophy only to find out what I already knew before we drafted him....

... but when I start thinking about the nearly certain fact that we're stuck with him for at least 1 more year and the best I can realistically look forward to is that 3 years later after this mess started, 8-8 would be an improvement and Cam reaches his ceiling of NFL mediocrity....hate is in fact a very kind word. Detest, despise, loathe and abhor Cam Newton and his myriad of fans who only gives a poo about this team if it's starting Cam Newton.

Of course I might I have misplaced hate for Cam due to Richardson, for one moronic decision after another, but there's no chance in hell he'll ever be fired, so who else am I supposed to hate other than the direct result of his egomaniac, politically correct, and whorish, financially driven decisions?

We will probably win 3 meaningless games against terrible teams this year, Cam will appear to "improve" once again, which means Richardson is once again going to feel hopeful and likely to hire a GM and coach whom he demands wins WITH Newton, rather than hiring the best man for the job and demands they win by any means necessary.


FML.

Oh yeah, Happy Thanksgiving :)


please melt down and run away again

it doesn't have to be anything fancy. just an argument over the definition of "narcissist" where you're using dictionary.com and the people disagreeing with you are using peer reviewed reports from psychology journals will do.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users