Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

What Happens if DeAngelo Williams is Cut or Traded?


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#1 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:56 PM

I just had a thought pop into my head. What will we do if we lose DeAngelo? Draft a RB, sign one to compete with Tauren Poole for backing up Jonathan? Someone tell me your thoughts. I'm hoping for Kenjon Barner personally.

#2 SuperJTheGreat

SuperJTheGreat

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,904 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:58 PM

Who cares? He taking up big bucks. He is not used right, let him win a ring.

#3 PhillyB

PhillyB

    that jungle football

  • ALL-PRO
  • 19,772 posts
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:18 PM

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.

#4 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:21 PM

draft one in the 6th or 5th at highest. We need to stop putting so much towards running backs we dont use. We would be fine without DWill where were at since we do have Tolbert

#5 Smitty Is Our Savior

Smitty Is Our Savior

    Jesus Shuttlesworth

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,793 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:23 PM

I wouldn't draft one. Obviously Gio Bernard is the best in this draft, but he'll go in the first or early second. If we lose D and we want another RB, go with Poole & Stew.

#6 DeeJay

DeeJay

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,086 posts
  • LocationHell Paso Texas

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:31 PM

Trade to Green Bay I can see.

#7 BeasonBeastingBacks

BeasonBeastingBacks

    Farewell Sweet Prince

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,198 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:40 PM

Well, we take on a big cap hit. Then I would assume we use Poole as the back up.

#8 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:44 PM

Who cares? He taking up big bucks. He is not used right, let him win a ring.


Lots of truth in this comment.

#9 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:46 PM

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.


If we have a better Offensive Coordinator next year, it will be different. Who knows, we might ACTUALLY use our RB's! But yes we do need to fix our OL.

#10 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,339 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:46 PM

Or maybe we keep him and a new coach has the ability to use him correctly?

#11 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:47 PM

And btw, I think Armond Smith is above Poole.

#12 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:50 PM

draft one in the 6th or 5th at highest. We need to stop putting so much towards running backs we dont use. We would be fine without DWill where were at since we do have Tolbert


I agree for the most part about what you said, except what we do with RB's currently in our play-calling won't matter with new coaching staff next year if we get one. Also Tolbert can play RB or FB. Though we could use a better blocking FB, Tolbert can play RB, TE, or FB. That's why I think we keep Tolbert at FB. Hope I didn't confuse you lol.

#13 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:51 PM

Trade to Green Bay I can see.


I'm just hoping we can get a 4th, 5th, or 6th for DeAngelo. I don't care who to. However, I have seen Green Bay suggested before.

#14 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:53 PM

Or maybe we keep him and a new coach has the ability to use him correctly?


Yea, but the money DeAngelo makes though... even with new coaching staff, I don't think it will matter.

#15 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:54 PM

And btw, I think Armond Smith is above Poole.


Why do you think that?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com