Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthro

The Anti-Walmart

236 posts in this topic

answer the question and i will tell you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why are those things mutually exclusive? did i die and go to hell, the only place where trickle down economics works?

Yep... Pretty much.

Just as the Banking stimulus was supposed to stimulate consumer and business loans... But went to bonuses, sales incentive trips..

Its why I called BS on giving corporations big tax breaks bc recent trends are that money will pay for the 300 person all expense paid trip to Atlantis..not to Joe the widget maker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it must be pretty hard to type with pom poms in your hands

And a dick in your mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

since your smugness appears to be affecting your ability to read, I'll slow this down for you a little...

how does repeating "supply and demand" over and over negate the idea of the government supplementing walmart's wages and lack of benefits?

Uhm MadHatter runs a business so maybe you should leave the econominies figurin to experts okay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

answer the question and i will tell you.

it's a bullshit question so i'll give it the answer it deserves: i prefer both, equally. now, o wise pstall, what does this mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not to mention... where do you think all those walmart employees spend their assistance checks?

yea, that's right.

Fun fact: WalMart employees spend more per week at WalMart than the average WalMart customer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the TS factory fire, which was a little dramatic but an effective statement nevertheless

"I HAVE TO WORK THANKSGIVING, ITS LIKE BEING BURNED ALIVE!!!!!!"

smh

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And a dick in your mouth.

8 hour ban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so basically you think that you should accept whatever conditions that were present when you were hired? and yet you, and others, can't see the parallels between that and historical arguments against workers rights?

this is the only post i've seen in this entire thread that gets to the core philosophical argument necessary to address to come to any sort of conclusion in this debate. well that and the TS factory fire, which was a little dramatic but an effective statement nevertheless

No its really not and this is why...

People with ideology like Cantrell here see everything in black-and-white, no shades of grey at all.

Comparing not having holidays off at a retail store to say... unsafe working conditions, or even low wages is not a good comparison... not even close.

No one here, certainly not me, is advocating that workers should simply accept things as they are and never work for a better working environment... but if you accept a job where there are working days on holidays, then you have to work holidays.

It's a pretty simple concept, but if you see life like he apparently does, I guess it's not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites