Offensive line
#1
Posted 01 December 2012 - 11:39 AM
Why would that be good or bad?
#2
Posted 01 December 2012 - 02:14 PM
#3
Posted 01 December 2012 - 08:06 PM
#4
Posted 01 December 2012 - 08:10 PM
#5
Posted 01 December 2012 - 09:52 PM
I just want to know why because if memory seres me right he was a guard in college rightYea I hate this stupid idea of moving Bell to RG. I rather just draft a RG in the 2nd
#6
Posted 01 December 2012 - 10:06 PM
Left tackle, really should be his position in the league, very upright player and much better pass blocker than run blocker. Jordan Gross was never a special LT, was a better RT. Right guard you want a guy with good feet and athletisism for pulling but also a physical guy who can dominate the guy in front of him.I just want to know why because if memory seres me right he was a guard in college right
#7
Posted 01 December 2012 - 10:22 PM
#8
Posted 01 December 2012 - 11:14 PM
#9
Posted 02 December 2012 - 11:18 AM
I just want to know why because if memory seres me right he was a guard in college right
College is different from Pro. Beason was a dominant OLB at the U, but he clearly isn't able to play OLB as well as when he's playing Mike for us.
Bell has become a solid RT and that have become his best suited position.
If you want an OG, take a Barrett Jones in the 2nd. But please dnt move Bell to RG.
#10
Posted 02 December 2012 - 03:50 PM
I was wrong he was a tackle in college so It wouldn't make much sense to move him inside.Left tackle, really should be his position in the league, very upright player and much better pass blocker than run blocker. Jordan Gross was never a special LT, was a better RT. Right guard you want a guy with good feet and athletisism for pulling but also a physical guy who can dominate the guy in front of him.
#11
Posted 02 December 2012 - 05:00 PM
#12
Posted 02 December 2012 - 07:35 PM
star in the first and fluker in the 2nd
My only problem with that is we're not taking one of the several good looking WR prospects there. I also think RG is a bigger problem than LT on the OL.
#13
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:08 PM
My only problem with that is we're not taking one of the several good looking WR prospects there. I also think RG is a bigger problem than LT on the OL.
Fully agreed.
I want Star or Hankins in the 1st then a WR/FS in the 2nd.
OG is also a much more needed position than LT. I still can't see why many members are calling for a franchise LT after "one" poor game vs Denver. If we go LT 1st, that'll be the stupidest decision making by a GM in Panthers history. What are we going to do with Gross and Bell?
If we don't go DT 1st, it better be a WR.
#14
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:13 PM
I just want to know why because if memory seres me right he was a guard in college right
The RT position is a position that is your best run blocker. He's a guy that can strafe off the line quickly (meaning his feet positioning has to be great) and a guy that also never gets caught flat-footed.
The RG is a guy that needs to come off the ball low, with a powerful punch, either knocking the defender back, opening up a lane, or tucking behind the RT and getting out into space, low enough to clear out LBers.
Bell is more of the former. He's got nimble feet, but he's not fast. He's got decent technique, can swat away defenders, but plays upright. He doesn't come off the ball low, or with an incredibly powerful punch, meaning he needs to be a guy on the outside.
#15
Guest_Pablo Honey_*
Posted 03 December 2012 - 04:01 AM
10-12 I want Keenan Allen, D Milliner- maybe Chance Warmack.
I'm starting to like the idea of drafting Warmack.
I've heard from numerous scouts that he could be the best guard prospect of all time, better than Steve Hutchinson.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





