124 replies to this topic

[rayzor]

Incorrect

It was disabled when a lunatic that was banned recruited a bunch of people to sign up and neg rep established posters to smack.

wasn't that pffl?

i can't remember.

[SZ James]

I'll admit that we got buttfuged there

maybe have like a 50 post minimum before you can start using it

[Zod]

Dunno, ask jtgreensboro I think it was his rep

[SZ James]

jtgreensboro was never actually banned to smack he was just being a giant crybaby vagina over his rep count

absurd how that one idiot's complaining ruined it for everyone else

[X-Clown]

wasn't that pffl?

i can't remember.

Nah, not him

He had a lot of usernames, sno3, notorious bob. He is the same guy who pretended to be a broncos fan that met Smitty at the palm.

[Doyle]

SN03. I spent like 3 days trying to offset his negs for people.

[Doyle]

Nah, not him

He had a lot of usernames, sno3, notorious bob. He is the same guy who pretended to be a broncos fan that met Smitty at the palm.

The meeting Smitty at the Palm was actually pretty funny IMO.

[coralreefer_1]

What would be cool would be if there were an option to vote to delete a particular post/thread.

For instance, say Joe Dongsmoker creates a thread in the same vein that is being discussed elsewhere. Or otherwise Joe Dongsmoker makes a post that the general community feels is nothing more than trolling.

In those cases, users could "vote" to have the thread/post removed by clicking a button much like the "pie" or negrep option. Those who have the option to vote like above would be determined not by post count, but by time on the huddle (as in, signup date) and if a predetermined number of what we might call "veteran" users voted to have the post/thread removed, it would be trashed

I think this would do more to clean up the site rather than simply neg-repping folks...that does nothing other than let others know they tend to post crap, but otherwise allows them to continue to post crap and let their crap remain visible and public, clutter the board with repetitive threads, and continue the cycle of trash such posters take such joy in.

[SZ James]

Here's the thread in which jtgreensboro was being a whiny biatch...

http://www.carolinah...-to-remove-rep/

more people wanted to keep rep. he posted this in the main forum so he wasn't banned he was just complaining about nothing.

[rayzor]

Dunno, ask jtgreensboro I think it was his rep

jtgreensboro was never actually banned to smack he was just being a giant crybaby vagina over his rep count

absurd how that one idiot's complaining ruined it for everyone else

ahhhh....i remember now.

still i think it would be a good idea, even if it's just temporary. consider it a trial run.

[SZ James]

SN03 ruined everything.

oh look everyone it's SN03 wave at him

[awdeansr]

Incorrect

It was disabled when a lunatic that was banned recruited a bunch of people to sign up and neg rep established posters to smack.

Thank you for the correction.

[SZ James]

Thank you for the correction.

you were right actually