Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Rubi

OLine or DLine ?

71 posts in this topic

Which one do you think is a bigger need and why?

I will start it

I feel like we need a franchise LT. Gross is obviously on the decline. He has been beat like a drum this year. He's old and he's expensive. We really need a blue chip LT to protect Cam and to solidify our shotty line. We protect Cam, he makes better throws, we run better, hold the ball longer, rest our defense etc...

You can't beat the elite teams/defenses without a great OLine...playoff teams have great OLines...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're one DT away from having an elite D Line. After seeing Hardy take some snaps at the nose, I like the below lineup for years to come.

CJ/Star/Hardy/FA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think dt, but its hard to judge when CJ is getting held every single play and the announcers dare to remark on them not getting a penalty called against them all game. Complete joke. That said hardy is much better at end then dt. You FAIL!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardy moves inside on passing downs anyways. Most of his sacks has come from the DT position, and Frank is going to continue to get better, so we need him on the field as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think even with our shitty o-line, our offense would be just fine against most teams if we had an elite defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly I think we could make the Dline elite with a blue chip DT. The Oline could go from absolutely atrocious to respectable with some quality depth and a decent guard, which we could pick up later in the draft or in FA on the cheap. Bell looks serviceable, gross isn't playing elite, but he's not playing too terribly either. Kalil will be back next year. Amini I think has promise.

I also think with a new coaching staff what we have on the Oline could look alot better despite it's lack of talent. If you watch other teams with poor Oline talent they still know how to force a pocket. I think much of chud's playcalling requires perfect execution and demands each blocker to be able to hold their man and doesn't leave room for any one guy to let someone slip through.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both.

We need to address the trenches in a big way this offseason.

If Star is on the board, I take him because I think he's the best lineman prospect available. I wouldn't mind at all going best lineman prospect on the board in the 1st and the 2cd, barring another position of need (WR and DB in particular) presenting far better value for the pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st rd DT either Star or the guy from Ohio State. The Giant model, to beat the elite offensive teams, you have to get to the Rodgers, Mannings, and Brees and make them hurry. With a stud in the center, the line becomes formidable.

2nd rd Best available either Guard, or Safety, preferred in that order. I don't believe the OTs are as bad as some think, with better Guard play, the tackle play will improve. The main thing is getting 5 guys there who can grow into a unit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CJ, Dwan, Star and Hardy, with Alexander rotating in.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol so they made Jinder the universal champion? big deal, the b show champion has never been even as prestigious as the intercontinental championship was in the early 90s. the real world champion is being held by a part timer, just like it kind of was in the early 90s whenever hogan was carrying it.
    • What are you waiting for? The final.solution?
    • This reminded me of his speech in Charleston (Boeing?). He talked of punishments for companies that tried to move jobs to other countries. Why hamstring countries so that they can't operate with efficiency and effectiveness. Seems awfully collectivist and anti-capitalist for someone who is touted as a pro-business capitalist. So here, with Carrier, he was applauded for some sort of effort to keep some amount of jobs in America. Yay. Oh wait, that wasn't actually sustainable? Federal Gov't meddling into corporate staffing decisions didn't work out as planned? Color me shocked. I don't think this guy has a clue what he is doing. He has no real ideology and doesn't understand , or care,  how things work or what the consequences to any action or comment will be.  I guess he is just throwing poo against the wall to see what sticks and what will appease his mouth-breathing, isolationist, supporters.