Who would you choose for the next 5 years? Russel Wilson, Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, or Ed from Good Burger Aka Bob Griffin
#16
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:16 PM
b/c he's the best QB out of those listed...he's just got it...he seems like a very good leader...he's accurate...he knows how to get it done in the clutch...what he's doing in Indy is just special
#17
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:17 PM
We have Cam, the Colts have Luck. That's the way it will be for the next decade or so (hopefully). The best we can do is maximize Cam's potential here to outweigh Luck's advantages that we (or at least I) drooled over two years ago.
#18
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:17 PM
i would take Andrew Luck...why?
b/c he's the best QB out of those listed...he's just got it...he seems like a very good leader...he's accurate...he knows how to get it done in the clutch...what he's doing in Indy is just special
Hard to argue with that.
#19
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:17 PM
Cam also has six fewer INT's and leads the league by a wide margin in yards per attempt. As we all know, Cam is still bigger, stronger, faster.
Let's just be patient and be happy that we have our guy. A new regime will do wonders for Mr. Newton.
It's not even close (couldn't resist).
#20
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:19 PM
People I think make a bit too big of a deal out of being "smart" enough to play quarterback... but it's really not about being what most would consider smart. It's more of an experience factor - having an endless bag of tricks to accomplish your goals. Playing quarterback is closer to playing chess than it is to designing nuclear reactors... if that makes any sense.
#21
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:22 PM
At the risk of throwing out hyperbole like "it's not even close", I will just simply say Cam, without hesitation. Luck has had a great rookie year. Luck's team has also benefitted from a ridiculously easy schedule (still haven't even played the Texans) and also had a huge emotional lift after Pagano was diagnosed with leukemia. Even still, the Colts are still -41 in point differential on the year (don't think this means anything in comparing teams? ask Vegas oddsmakers!). By comparison, the Panthers, with a much more difficult schedule, are only -57!
Cam also has six fewer INT's and leads the league by a wide margin in yards per attempt. As we all know, Cam is still bigger, stronger, faster.
Let's just be patient and be happy that we have our guy. A new regime will do wonders for Mr. Newton.
It's not even close (couldn't resist).
Cam's only like .1 faster according to combine numbers. Just FYI. He is more shifty though. No comparison on that.
#22
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:25 PM
I like Cam as much as any prospect int he past 20 years.... I do worry a little bit about his intangibles.... his character.... but I still take him over Luck and RG3 I think. All 3 should be HOF caliber guys barring injury.
#23
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:25 PM
However I would take the Seahawks, Redskins and Indy's coaching and backroom staff hands down.
#24
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:26 PM
I asked this question partially because I went to The Panthers vs Broncos game a few weeks back. Everyone there I asked seemed to wish we had Luck instead. They were Panthers fans BTW.
No they weren't. They were dumbasses. F*ck them.
#25
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:27 PM
#26
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:28 PM
Cam's only like .1 faster according to combine numbers. Just FYI. He is more shifty though. No comparison on that.
Running in shorts speed is not even close to running on the field speed. Luck has some wheels, but he's not as fast as Cam.
#27
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:28 PM
#28
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:30 PM
#29
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:30 PM
Cam's only like .1 faster according to combine numbers. Just FYI. He is more shifty though. No comparison on that.
Thats also without pads and in a straight line. You've got to remember that players who aren't natural speed demons or don't have track history generally train pretty hard for the 40 for the combine because it's the single most overrated trait in football and literally makes or breaks your draft stock. Hell look at Dontari Poe... someone had a gif of him being stonewalled by a small running back and his size and combine speed suggest that RB should of been goop on the bottom of his shoe.
#30
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:31 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





