Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

With 4 games left


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#11 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,063
  • Reputation: 1,993
HUDDLER

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:34 PM

You might be right come to think of it, the point was to get as many guys out there as possible. We have so many folks wanting to draft a WR first, but Adams, Pilares, Gettis are still unknowns. And with Murphy and Lafell, we might be stocked at WR. But again, who knows. Put them out there now

#12 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationTulsa, OK
HUDDLER

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:48 PM

I would adjust that to say..

first round: best available OT, DT, OG

second round: best available OT, DT, OG, S

We should be 100% focused on the LOS. CBs are a dime a dozen.


Nobody will take an OG with a Top 5 pick.

#13 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • Joined: 05-January 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 581
  • Reputation: 35
HUDDLER

Posted 04 December 2012 - 03:43 PM

I'm all for trading the 1st round pick for more picks. Like #5 for St. Louis' 15 and 17.

#14 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,426
  • Reputation: 992
HUDDLER

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:24 PM

We gotta strenghten the lines, gotta be able to run and stop the run. And protect our QB

#15 ItsPantone278

ItsPantone278

    ItsPantone278

  • Joined: 06-January 11
  • posts: 1,886
  • Reputation: 300
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:10 PM

Nobody will take an OG with a Top 5 pick.


I won't disagree with that, but I wouldn't mind if we took Warmack.

#16 OnlyPantherFaninMaine

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

    All In.

  • Joined: 04-September 09
  • posts: 6,827
  • Reputation: 3,359
  • LocationBrooklyn, NY
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 December 2012 - 06:16 AM

At this point I will be disappointed if we don't land Star or Joeckel.

#17 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,063
  • Reputation: 1,993
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:57 AM

I suppose if the Rams don't pick up Jake Long and want Joeckel that bad, at 15 and 17, we could take two of these guys:

Taylor Lewan OT Mich
Chance Warmack OG Alabama
Jonathon Jenkins DT GA

#18 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationTulsa, OK
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:38 AM

I won't disagree with that, but I wouldn't mind if we took Warmack.


I'd be pretty mad if we took Warmack with a Top 5 pick. Considering we can possibly get a guy like Barrett Jones in the 2nd round.

#19 TruthVsComfort

TruthVsComfort

    Member

  • Joined: 29-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 428
  • Reputation: 199
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2012 - 02:47 PM

For those that have watched them play extensively: is there that great of a difference between Hankins and Star? Would we be losing much if we were left only with Hankins on the board?

#20 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
  • LocationSouthern California
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2012 - 04:34 PM

For those that have watched them play extensively: is there that great of a difference between Hankins and Star? Would we be losing much if we were left only with Hankins on the board?


I actually prefer Hankins, especially if we retain Dwan Edwards. Hankins is more of a nose tackle which is what we need to replace Ron.

They are both great prospects but like I said, Hankins is the better nose tackle with experience against very strong offensive linemen.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users