Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Rand Paul 2016

   21 votes

  1. 1. Would you vote for Rand Paul in 2016?

    • Yes
      6
    • No
      11
    • Unsure
      4

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

27 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

This needs to happen!!!

Fug Republicans and Democrats!! Libertarian all the way!!


Go ahead discuses (Note I don't agree with all of his positions, "abortion" but it is what it is)


[b] Political positions[/b]

Paul supports [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_limit"]term limits[/url], a [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_Budget_Amendment#United_States"]balanced budget amendment[/url], and the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read_the_Bills_Act"]Read the Bills Act[/url], in addition to the widespread reduction of federal spending and taxation. He has gained prominence for his independent positions on many political issues, often clashing with both Republicans and [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)"]Democrats[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-schreiner1-5"][5][/url][/sup]
[b] Abortion and bioethics[/b]

Paul is opposed to [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion"]abortion[/url] and supports a [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Life_Amendment"]Human Life Amendment[/url] and a Life at Conception Act.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-123"][123][/url][/sup][sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-RPabortion-124"][124][/url][/sup][sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-NYTKentucky-125"][125][/url][/sup] He also opposes abortion in cases of [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape"]rape[/url] and [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest"]incest[/url],[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-126"][126][/url][/sup] but supports use of the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning-after_pill"]morning-after pill[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-127"][127][/url][/sup] He opposes federal funding for abortion.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-RPabortion-124"][124][/url][/sup] He takes a [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights"]states' rights[/url] position, favoring the overturn of [i][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade"]Roe v. Wade[/url][/i] and allowing states to decide on the legality of abortions without federal involvement.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-128"][128][/url][/sup]
According to the Paul campaign, Paul received a 100% pro-life score on a Kentucky Right to Life survey[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-129"][129][/url][/sup] and indicated on the survey that he opposed [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cloning"]human cloning[/url]. This was disputed by Kentucky Right to Life, however, who endorsed Paul's primary opponent instead and claimed that Paul did not, in fact, answer the cloning question.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-130"][130][/url][/sup]
[b] Campaign finance reform[/b]

Paul opposes the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act_of_2002"]Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002[/url] and has called it a "dangerous piece of legislation".[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-amconmag.com-131"][131][/url][/sup] Instead, he supports regulating the contracts given out by[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress"]Congress[/url] and placing limits on corporations receiving government contracts. Paul opposes legislation limiting the amount of money individuals, corporations, and organizations can give to candidates. Additionally, Paul has proposed "mandating a clause in all federal contracts over $1 million that requires the recipient to pledge not to lobby government or contribute to campaigns during the terms of the contract."[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-amconmag.com-131"][131][/url][/sup][sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-132"][132][/url][/sup]
[b] Civil liberties[/b]

Paul opposes the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act"]USA PATRIOT Act[/url], including [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_wiretapping"]warrantless searches[/url] and breach of individual privacy.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-133"][133][/url][/sup] He has also proposed that the TSA be eliminated.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-134"][134][/url][/sup]
[b] Economics and tax cuts[/b]

Paul has been a longtime opponent of the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program"]bank and auto industry bailouts[/url].
He also opposes the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act_of_1913"]Federal Reserve Act of 1913[/url] and the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System"]Federal Reserve[/url]'s control of the money supply and interest rates. He has advocated allowing the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market"]free market[/url] to regulate interest rates, and supports Congress' constitutional role in controlling the money supply. Paul endorses H.R. 1207, the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Transparency_Act"]Federal Reserve Transparency Act[/url], a bill, introduced by his father, mandating an audit of the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve"]Federal Reserve[/url]. Paul supports transparency and accountability of the semi-private institution. Additionally, Paul opposes[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation"]inflation[/url] and supports "restoring the value of the dollar that has devalued by approximately 95% since the Federal Reserve's inception in 1913".[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-135"][135][/url][/sup]
Paul supports tax cuts and a [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_Budget_Amendment#United_States"]balanced budget amendment[/url], and has criticized both [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Republican_Party"]Republicans[/url] and [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Democratic_Party"]Democrats[/url] on [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deficit_spending"]deficit spending[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-136"][136][/url][/sup]
[b] Education[/b]

Paul supports returning control of education to local communities and parents and thus eliminating the federal [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education"]Department of Education[/url], but he says that some functions of the Department of Education, such as disbursing student loans and Pell Grants, should be transferred to other departments instead of being eliminated.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-137"][137][/url][/sup][sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-138"][138][/url][/sup] Paul opposes federal regulation of [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeschooling"]homeschooling[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-139"][139][/url][/sup]
[b] Energy[/b]

Paul supports allowing the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market"]free market[/url] to compete and dictate which forms of energy to use. He opposes subsidizing energy companies, and would support allowing tax breaks for companies that produce [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_energy"]alternative energy[/url] such as [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_energy"]wind[/url], [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy"]solar[/url], or [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_energy"]geothermal[/url]. He has said that subsidizing the energy industry will only add incentive for companies to lobby the federal government.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-140"][140][/url][/sup]
[b] Health care[/b]

Paul opposes federal government involvement in [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care"]health care[/url]. He has stated that he would repeal the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Maintenance_Organization_Act_of_1973"]*** Act of 1973[/url] that "drives a wedge between the patient and [one's] doctor".[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-RPHealth-141"][141][/url][/sup] He believes that government has driven up the cost of health care and causes the quality and coverage to decrease. Paul would support a free market approach to health care, including tax deductions for medical expenses. He opposes federal regulations discouraging businesses from providing coverage. He supports [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Savings_Account"]Health Savings Accounts[/url] (HSAs).[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-RPHealth-141"][141][/url][/sup] On [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(United_States)"]Medicare[/url], Paul has suggested higher deductibles as well as changes to premiums or eligibility rules as ways to address what he sees as the program's looming financial problems, saying "You want to have more participation by the person who's receiving the entitlement... by that I mean that they need to be more involved with some sort of economic transaction every time they use their entitlement, and that means they have to bear more of the burden."[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-medicare-142"][142][/url][/sup] Paul also stated that he does not support such changes for current retirees or people nearing retirement.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-medicare-142"][142][/url][/sup] Following the Supreme Court decision upholding the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordable_Care_Act"]Affordable Care Act[/url], Senator Paul released a statement saying, "Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional."[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-143"][143][/url][/sup]
[b] Illegal immigration[/b]

Paul has proposed adding security to the border by installing an electronic fence and helicopter stations to respond to breaches.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-144"][144][/url][/sup] He opposes [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States_of_America"]birthright citizenship[/url] for children of illegal immigrants.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-145"][145][/url][/sup] Paul has said that courts should review the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution"]14th Amendment[/url], which guarantees citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States," to conclude whether or not it should apply to the children of illegal immigrants. If court challenges fail, Paul would support a constitutional amendment that would deny citizenship to children of illegal immigrants who are born in the United States.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-146"][146][/url][/sup]
[b] Marijuana[/b]

Paul believes the issue of [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_marijuana"]medical marijuana[/url] is a [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights"]states' rights[/url] issue and that the federal government should not interfere.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-Meno-147"][147][/url][/sup] In August, the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press"]Associated Press[/url] reported that Paul said he was opposed to the legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes,[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-Alford-148"][148][/url][/sup] but the Paul campaign says he was misquoted.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-Meno-147"][147][/url][/sup] Though Paul describes himself as a "[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservative"]social conservative[/url]," he was nonetheless described by the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press"]AP[/url] reporter as holding "libertarian leanings on drugs" and believing some drug sentences were too harsh.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-Alford-148"][148][/url][/sup]He announced plans to propose eliminating mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana possession in November 2012.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-149"][149][/url][/sup]
[b] Foreign policy and national defense[/b]

Paul holds that the primary Constitutional function of the federal government is national defense, and that the greatest national security threat is the lack of border security. He supports eliminating issuance of visas to people from “about ten rogue nations.” He supports trying terrorists caught on the battlefield in [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunal"]military tribunals[/url] at [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp"]Guantanamo Bay detention camp[/url]. Paul believes that when the United States goes to war, Congress must declare war as mandated by the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution"]United States Constitution[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-150"][150][/url][/sup]
During his 2010 Senate campaign Paul questioned the idea that U.S. Middle East policy is "killing more terrorists than it creates." He supported the war in Afghanistan and opposed rapid withdrawal from Iraq.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-151"][151][/url][/sup] He says he would have voted against the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Iraq"]invasion of Iraq[/url] and questioned whether the intelligence was manipulated."[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-CBS-152"][152][/url][/sup]
He also spoke against U.S. overseas military bases.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-153"][153][/url][/sup]
[b] Same-sex marriage[/b]

Paul personally opposes [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage"]same-sex marriage[/url], but believes the issue should be left to the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_governments_of_the_United_States"]States[/url] to decide.[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-NYTKentucky-125"][125][/url][/sup]
[b] Second Amendment[/b]

Paul would oppose all [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control"]gun control[/url] legislation, a position he says is supported by the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution"]Second Amendment to the United States Constitution[/url].[sup][url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#cite_note-154"][154[/url][/sup]
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If only he was a libertarian.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Anyone but Obama...wait a tic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

He is not quite as out there as his old man. I marked unsure, because I need to learn a little more about his policies, but from what I have heard, I don't think I would vote for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I would love nothing more then to have the old man Ron Paul run again... But it looks like he hanging up the hat for good, and Rand is the next best thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='arc' timestamp='1354741870' post='2032826']
Anyone but Obama...wait a tic
[/quote]


I am fairly certain no one will ever vote for Obama for president again, at least not legally. :)
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

He's not a libertarian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Gazi' timestamp='1354744727' post='2032909']
He's not a libertarian.
[/quote]

that's ok, most libertarians aren't either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

fug republicans and democrats! now vote for this republican!
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Gazi' timestamp='1354744727' post='2032909']
He's not a libertarian.
[/quote]


He's the closest thing to one that is quote "electable"

Gary Johnson was in line with most issues but just didn't fit the bill as president material

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Jase' timestamp='1354741713' post='2032821']
If only he was a libertarian.
[/quote]


This. He's not even close, he's just a right wing whacko. I like his dad but have very little if any respect for him.

The only republican I can think of that I would vote for is Jon Huntsman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Cat' timestamp='1354806671' post='2033836']
This. He's not even close, he's just a right wing whacko. I like his dad but have very little if any respect for him.

The only republican I can think of that I would vote for is Jon Huntsman.
[/quote]

i love you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites