For those of us who are wanting a 'Star' DT/NT...
Posted 06 December 2012 - 03:09 AM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 03:19 AM
That actually makes sense, they'd try to copy the success of a division rival (Broncos) taking a 3-4 OLB in a 4-3 defense.
Watch, Raiders will pass up on Star for Jarvis or a Montgomery/Mingo. They likes to surprise people even themselves.
Posted 06 December 2012 - 03:21 AM
I'd be more than fine with Hankins, but Star is my preference. If by some stroke of terrible luck they're both gone I hope Nix is available in the 2nd. Those three, along with John Jenkins to a lesser degree, are the only DTs I really want from this draft.
Yea same here. But I'd like to get a Richardson or Ford in the 2nd if we somehow pass on a DT in the 1st.
I'm not a big fan of Short and he's a 3tech which we already have in Dwan. We need a NT.
Posted 06 December 2012 - 04:57 AM
But if we want a true pocket collapsing, aggressive playing nose tackle with experience against strong linemen, then Hankins is the better choice.
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:43 AM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:01 PM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:36 PM
4 games left, how many can we win? I doubt it's all of them. If it is, then hell yea! But seriously, We're going to finish 4-12 or 5-11.
I don't know. I think Ron has one more win in him AT MOST. No way we get 5 wins IMO. He'll blow it some how.
Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:21 PM
Dwan and Ron are holding it down for now and I think Dwan has several quality years left. No doubt, we need to address it still, but I don't know that it is our #1 need.
I'm thinking Safety or a solid #2 CB (assuming Norman will be taking over Gamble's spot) are higher up there for now.
Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:01 PM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:15 PM
Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:18 PM
Then we get to pick Reid!
I'm just starting to accept the fact that both Joeckel and Star will be gone when we pick. Would be our luck with the way this season has gone,