Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

#1 LKuechly

LKuechly

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 714 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 07:31 AM

http://profootballta...-a-gun-problem/

#2 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,022 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:12 AM

not a fan of his on the football field, but he's right...

wonder if he'd want to be on my Zombie apocalypse team...

#3 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,876 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:18 AM

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol

#4 rippadonn

rippadonn

    Since 2006

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:21 AM

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.

#5 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:27 AM

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.



no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?

#6 natty

natty

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,775 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:32 AM

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol



hahahahahahaahhahahahahah

I don't disagree with him but I don't think James Harrison and smart guy have ever been in the same sentence.

#7 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:36 AM

Posted Image

#8 rippadonn

rippadonn

    Since 2006

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:58 AM

no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?


There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.

#9 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:05 PM

There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.



so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?


if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?

#10 rippadonn

rippadonn

    Since 2006

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:19 PM

so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?


if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?



Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.

#11 rippadonn

rippadonn

    Since 2006

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:26 PM

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.

#12 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:30 PM

Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.


that's historically, tactically and fundamentally wrong and i know you aren't actually stupid enough to believe it.

no single thing has shaped the modern world more than the technological advancement of weaponry.


the cognitive dissonance required to both argue that guns are important for self defense and that they are completely innefective at self defense is pretty astounding.

#13 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,585 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:31 PM

Every country should have a nuke.

Atomic bombs don't kill people. People do.

#14 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:32 PM

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.


too bad somebody didn't have a hand full of dryer lint... they could've fought him off.

#15 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,585 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:34 PM

If every country had a nuke, no one would ever set off a nuclear weapon because they'd all be too scared. FACT


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com