Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LKuechly

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem

107 posts in this topic

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/05/james-harrison-says-kc-tragedy-not-a-gun-problem/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not a fan of his on the football field, but he's right...

wonder if he'd want to be on my Zombie apocalypse team...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.

no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol

hahahahahahaahhahahahahah

I don't disagree with him but I don't think James Harrison and smart guy have ever been in the same sentence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?

There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.

so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?

if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?

if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?

Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • :...he at the very least cut down on the bad decisions in 2016." Then two  paragraphs later :-Decision making more random than earlier in his career...": Both of those can't be true, what can be true is this guy likes really big arms and really doesn't like Ryan. Sorry, it's just absurd to put Tanneyhill, Bradford, Prescott, Palmer [at this stage of his career], and  Mariota, ahead of Ryan. You want to put all the super bowl winning QBs ahead of him, fine.  And Cam doesn't deserve to be 3rd over, Big Ben, Brady, Wilson and Brees.  He's obviously a big Cam fan, but no.
    • I still love Josh.  Sue me.
    • My argument is that Josh Norman played on a poo defense which would negatively impact any player. Bradberry while surrounded by better talent barely outranked him.. You went off on a tangent about Norman being exposed which is absolute horseshit.  BTW Shula sucks and has always sucked which is why he has the burden to prove the opposite this year.