Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem

107 posts in this topic

Posted

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/05/james-harrison-says-kc-tragedy-not-a-gun-problem/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

not a fan of his on the football field, but he's right...

wonder if he'd want to be on my Zombie apocalypse team...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He could have used a rock on his girlfriend and threw himself off one of the stadium balconies, no difference. Guns don't kill people.

no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

James Harrison is one smart guy.

Wonder if Plaxico Burress blames his gunshot wound on his gun? Lol

hahahahahahaahhahahahahah

I don't disagree with him but I don't think James Harrison and smart guy have ever been in the same sentence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hit-Man.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

no difference between rocks and guns? do you read what you post?

There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There may be a depth to that statement the base may not understand, let me explain. If somebody wants to kill they will kill. He could have used a rock to carry out his will just like he could have used a gun. There.

so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?

if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

so you think there's an equal chance of success when attempting to kill someone with a rock as there would be with a gun?

if someone was trying to kill you, you wouldn't care if they had a rock or a gun? i mean, if they want to kill you, they WILL kill you right? regardless of any other variables?

Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.

that's historically, tactically and fundamentally wrong and i know you aren't actually stupid enough to believe it.

no single thing has shaped the modern world more than the technological advancement of weaponry.

the cognitive dissonance required to both argue that guns are important for self defense and that they are completely innefective at self defense is pretty astounding.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites