Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LKuechly

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem

Recommended Posts

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.

too bad somebody didn't have a hand full of dryer lint... they could've fought him off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


that's historically, tactically and fundamentally wrong and i know you aren't actually stupid enough to believe it.

no single thing has shaped the modern world more than the technological advancement of weaponry.

Is a gun easier to kill with, yes. But the problems don't lie with the gun. The problem exists in the user. I'm not saying a rock is a better weapon than a gun, yes that would be stupid, and I am not. I'm saying he could of carried out the same actions without the use of a gun.

If you want to call me stupid just call me stupid or batsh*t crazy as you prefer. This isn't an argument about guns is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

too bad somebody didn't have a hand full of dryer lint... they could've fought him off.

Creative use of dryer lint can be deadly also :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a gun easier to kill with, yes. But the problems don't lie with the gun. The problem exists in the user. I'm not saying a rock is a better weapon than a gun, yes that would be stupid, and I am not. I'm saying he could of carried out the same actions without the use of a gun.

If you want to call me stupid just call me stupid or batsh*t crazy as you prefer. This isn't an argument about guns is it?

he could've but the woman he was trying to kill would have had a significant better chance at survival both due to the literal mechanics of death and also the amount of conviction it takes to kill someone by smashing them repeatedly with a gory rock vs retracting your index finger. That's the point. Guns may not increase violent occurances but they certainly increase the subsequent death toll.

I'm honestly not a big gun-control guy, but when you guys spin in circles trying to act like there isn't actually an issue, you end up looking pretty silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




he could've but the woman he was trying to kill would have had a significant better chance at survival both due to the literal mechanics of death and also the amount of conviction it takes to kill someone by smashing them repeatedly with a gory rock vs retracting your index finger. That's the point. Guns may not increase violent occurances but they certainly increase the subsequent death toll.

I'm honestly not a big gun-control guy, but when you guys spin in circles trying to act like there isn't actually an issue, you end up looking pretty silly.

He could physically overpower HER and take her life and find a way to kill himself. What is silly about that?

Once again, there are more efficient weapons but that has nothing to do with a gun. Who is silly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually with beans, to an extent...

There are a lot of issues with guns in our country, but the problem is that there is no way to correct those issues... We can only try to better control them... But when you do that, it is a slippery slope...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually with beans, to an extent...

There are a lot of issues with guns in our country, but the problem is that there is no way to correct those issues... We can only try to better control them... But when you do that, it is a slippery slope...

Yeah, but then swords are next. My contention is that you have to change the mind to fix our problems not the weapon. Next its no weapons at all. Then no Kung Fu.

And some of you think I'm a hippie or something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×