Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LKuechly

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem

107 posts in this topic

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. Mans will is the issue not the weapon.

that's historically, tactically and fundamentally wrong and i know you aren't actually stupid enough to believe it.

no single thing has shaped the modern world more than the technological advancement of weaponry.

the cognitive dissonance required to both argue that guns are important for self defense and that they are completely innefective at self defense is pretty astounding.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every country should have a nuke.

Atomic bombs don't kill people. People do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember reading about a mass stabbing in China. Dude was running around attacking just anybody. He killed somebody.

too bad somebody didn't have a hand full of dryer lint... they could've fought him off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If every country had a nuke, no one would ever set off a nuclear weapon because they'd all be too scared. FACT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's historically, tactically and fundamentally wrong and i know you aren't actually stupid enough to believe it.

no single thing has shaped the modern world more than the technological advancement of weaponry.

Is a gun easier to kill with, yes. But the problems don't lie with the gun. The problem exists in the user. I'm not saying a rock is a better weapon than a gun, yes that would be stupid, and I am not. I'm saying he could of carried out the same actions without the use of a gun.

If you want to call me stupid just call me stupid or batsh*t crazy as you prefer. This isn't an argument about guns is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem does lie with the Nuclear Weapon either. Hell, nuclear fission has been occurring for billions of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

too bad somebody didn't have a hand full of dryer lint... they could've fought him off.

Creative use of dryer lint can be deadly also :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a gun easier to kill with, yes. But the problems don't lie with the gun. The problem exists in the user. I'm not saying a rock is a better weapon than a gun, yes that would be stupid, and I am not. I'm saying he could of carried out the same actions without the use of a gun.

If you want to call me stupid just call me stupid or batsh*t crazy as you prefer. This isn't an argument about guns is it?

he could've but the woman he was trying to kill would have had a significant better chance at survival both due to the literal mechanics of death and also the amount of conviction it takes to kill someone by smashing them repeatedly with a gory rock vs retracting your index finger. That's the point. Guns may not increase violent occurances but they certainly increase the subsequent death toll.

I'm honestly not a big gun-control guy, but when you guys spin in circles trying to act like there isn't actually an issue, you end up looking pretty silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you ever choked a mufugger with dryer lint?

don't knock it until you've done it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites