Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LKuechly

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem

107 posts in this topic

Weed yes....big gulp and ciggarettes no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to mention me and Panthro exchanged xoxo texts today and he directed me to delish pizza.

*goes to the shooting range*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to mention me and Panthro exchanged xoxo texts today and he directed me to delish pizza.

*goes to the shooting range*

We could get some Tacos AND go shooting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could get some Tacos AND go shooting.

Hit me up after the first of the year.

Putting some stuff together and super busy right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hit me up after the first of the year.

Putting some stuff together and super busy right now.

Cool.

My FiL does those cowboy shoot things on the weekends... we should try to hook up with him and do that sometime... or he could take us to Lejuene to the ranges.

Plus he's got the guns... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That cowboy shooting stuff is a waste of my time honestly.

Appreciate the invite, but I have -194143% interest in that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the assless chaps isn't it.

Bisquit, promise him you won't wear them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That cowboy shooting stuff is a waste of my time honestly.

Appreciate the invite, but I have -194143% interest in that.

Uhh... ok

It's the assless chaps isn't it.

Bisquit, promise him you won't wear them.

No, I only wear those when I "shoot" with Jase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, stop reframing my argument... If you'd like to respond to my argument, do so... If not, don't.

Intent is a f*cking GIVEN in homicide. THAT'S WHAT MAKES IT A HOMICIDE.

You aren't going to get me into some ridiculous argument that we both know is stupid... you want to talk about scenarios where cars and roof-tops can be used to murder people? please, do it with someone else. I'm trying (with great difficulty) to talk about guns.

So wait, now you have me confused...are we talking about intent-based murder or are we talking about capability? You said earlier we were talking about capability...in which case lots of things are capable of ending one's life. However, If we're now talking about murder, then you've changed the conversation. One has to make the conscious decision to kill another in order for that to occur...otherwise it would be characterized as an accident, which would include my examples of roof-tops, automobile accidents, and falling pianos...residing under your capability argument.

My point is not stupid just because you dont understand it. You seem to be talking in circles now. Guns didnt magically birth themselves into existance, while holding us hostage at the mercy of their murderous agendas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if we should allow any type of gun because the weapon itself is no matter (people will find someway to kill no matter what's available according to many here), so why stop at guns? Why should any weapon, including atomic bombs, be restricted?

yeah the analogy is totally appropriate when the argument is that we shouldn't distinguish between the killing power of different things because "people kill people" or whatever, and i'm not at all surprised that it wasn't debated any further than calling it "dumb" and forgetting it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites