Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

James Harrison says KC tragedy not a gun problem


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

#31 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,376 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:27 PM

Every country should have a nuke.

Atomic bombs don't kill people. People do.



Dumbest.



Analogy.



Ever.

#32 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,512 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:28 PM

Every woman has the capability to be a prostitute. Doesn't mean every one of them becomes one.

#33 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 15,459 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:29 PM

I say we ban all guns and replace them with rocket launchers.

#34 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,559 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:33 PM

Any weapon - a gun, a rock, your hands, etc, are no more than an extension of yourself.


Dumbest.



Analogy.



Ever.



Is it?

#35 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,909 posts
  • LocationPleiades

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:35 PM

stop trying to redefine my argument to fit your point please.

i'm not arguing intent, i'm arguing capability.


Then youre making an irrelevant and/or pointless argument...no offense of course. There are a ton of things out there that have the capability to kill...most of which arent even designed to do that. So are we talking about accidents now? If so, then we should hold tall roof-tops, cars, falling pianos, etc, just as accountable. A gun will not kill unless someone is operating it with the intent to kill. With that being said...you can't ignore intention, because intention is everything.

#36 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,851 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:36 PM

reminds me of

Posted Image

#37 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,559 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:38 PM

Then youre making an irrelevant and/or pointless argument. There are a ton of things out there that have the capability to kill...most of which arent even designed to do that. So are we talking about accidents now? If so, then we should hold tall roof-tops, cars, falling pianos, etc, just as accountable. A gun will not kill unless someone is operating it with the intent to kill. With that being said...you can't ignore intention, because intention is everything.


How much poorer would our culture be without the countless sonatas written for a M249 light machine gun?

#38 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,376 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:40 PM

Is it?


Yes

#39 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:44 PM

Every woman has the capability to be a prostitute. Doesn't mean every one of them becomes one.


nicely nonsensical and subtly misogynistic...


*high-five*

#40 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,909 posts
  • LocationPleiades

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:44 PM

The argument that a weapon is an extension of yourself and your intent is dumb?

#41 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,559 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:45 PM

Yes


So if we should allow any type of gun because the weapon itself is no matter (people will find someway to kill no matter what's available according to many here), so why stop at guns? Why should any weapon, including atomic bombs, be restricted?

#42 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,512 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:52 PM

So if we should allow any type of gun because the weapon itself is no matter (people will find someway to kill no matter what's available according to many here), so why stop at guns? Why should any weapon, including atomic bombs, be restricted?

Who gets to draw the line defining where guns pose a "fire in the theater" risk through their capability and one's constitutional right to bear arms.

#43 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,559 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:02 PM

All things we could discuss if any talk of sensible gun restriction wasn't immediately treated as the shock troops for the swarms of Black UN Helicopters swooping in to disarm every God-loving American Citizen.

#44 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,851 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:08 PM

All things we could discuss if any talk of sensible gun restriction wasn't immediately treated as the shock troops for the swarms of Black UN Helicopters swooping in to disarm every God-loving American Citizen.


Have at it. How can we do more to curb gun violence in the US?

#45 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,933 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:10 PM

UN helicopters, for one.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com