Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Will Beason be a Panther next year?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
98 replies to this topic

#31 Captain Morgan

Captain Morgan

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 09-January 12
  • posts: 2,773
  • Reputation: 1,523
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:03 PM

don't see Anderson on the team next year....we've got to cut some costs. And with a
starting LB corps of Beason-Luke-Davis, there's no room for Anderson.

The good news is, our LB corps is Beason-Luke-Davis. That is scary.

I am so happy to see Davis playing like he has this year. Hope Beason can
come back in the same way next year.

#32 Kakarot

Kakarot

    Aggie Pride!

  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,860
  • Reputation: 713
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:11 PM

I hope so

#33 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 23,672
  • Reputation: 19,769
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:29 PM

his cap hit isn't THAT bad, and assuming he comes back full strength (i think he will) he'll be an asset to the team. the defense still needs playmakers and he's definitely one.

i think we make a case for being the best 4-3 LB corps in the league next season.

#34 ElkinPanthersFan

ElkinPanthersFan

    Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 27-April 09
  • posts: 1,279
  • Reputation: 151
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:40 PM

Anderson as a rotational guy puts that corps as the best or damn near it in the league. Davis has been the pleasant surprise and hopefully that continues. Get us some back in guys and interior lineman and this D is fine. Problem we need just as much help on our Oline as well.

#35 Rubi

Rubi

    Squid Smasher

  • Joined: 28-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,384
  • Reputation: 756
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:43 PM

There's one other reason that most on here who don't know any better will argue.... Luke is plain, flat-out just not that good in coverage. There's a reason he's on the sidelines a lot in obvious 3rd and long passing situations...

He may improve over time, but right now, fuhggidaboudit


He's been on the field every play since Beason went down...



#36 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,941
  • Reputation: 3,453
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:47 PM

There's one other reason that most on here who don't know any better will argue.... Luke is plain, flat-out just not that good in coverage. There's a reason he's on the sidelines a lot in obvious 3rd and long passing situations...

He may improve over time, but right now, fuhggidaboudit


While he has struggled some in coverage, he has played very well on some plays as well. It's the weakest part of his game, but it's not from a lack of athleticism or ability. It's just an adjustment. It could also be scheme related, as he may be being coached to be intentionally over aggressive against the run. This would explain his overwhelming propensity on being sucked in on play action.

As to him being out for obvious 3rd and longs.....well that's just flat out wrong. He plays every down.

#37 Anybodyhome

Anybodyhome

    USN Retired

  • Joined: 07-July 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,803
  • Reputation: 2,598
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:55 PM

You guys should probably go back and look at his splits. When he played outside he was frequently on the sideline because he got caught in the wrong place too many times on passing downs. Read his interview where he talks about being off the field on 3rd downs...

#38 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:58 PM

in all honesty....with Luke in the middle I'd rather find a OLB that is a natural blitzer to compliment Luke. Beason isn't one.

#39 DeeJay

DeeJay

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,503
  • Reputation: 453
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:01 PM

He will retire a panther.

#40 Borat

Borat

    Very Nice, I Like!

  • Joined: 26-August 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 599
  • Reputation: 419
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:14 PM

Falcons sure could use him, but I think he's back.

#41 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,941
  • Reputation: 3,453
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:39 PM

You guys should probably go back and look at his splits. When he played outside he was frequently on the sideline because he got caught in the wrong place too many times on passing downs. Read his interview where he talks about being off the field on 3rd downs...

The discussion was about Luke and his play at the Mike not on the outside. You should have specified that you were only talking about the first four games.

#42 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,941
  • Reputation: 3,453
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:41 PM

Also., Beason was a lot worse in coverage before he got reinjured than Luke has been at any point this year.

#43 GAme

GAme

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 07-August 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 398
  • Reputation: 62
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:45 PM

We definitely need to swith Beason to free safety. He already said it's cool

#44 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 8,053
  • Reputation: 6,788
Moderators

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:56 PM

This is not meant as a direct insult to anybody in particular, but you guys that keep thinking you can play a 3-4 because you've got four really talented 4-3 LB's are a trip.

#45 PantherPhann89

PantherPhann89

    CPP "Carolina Panther Phann"

  • Joined: 25-June 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,549
  • Reputation: 434
HUDDLER

Posted 10 December 2012 - 07:07 PM

I think that Beason will remain a Panther if he's willing to restructure his contract and move positions.