The "I told you so" clowns
#16
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:52 PM
#17
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:53 PM
Even when we are down. You can't make a comeback if you don't score touchdowns, so you might as well celebrate a touchdown that is the first step on the road to a comeback.
#18
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:54 PM
And look at rg3 after he went down vs ravens....the "i told you so" clowns came out in bunches to use that as the reason to not like black QBs
You know why Negroes can't QB in the NFL??? Because RG3 hurt his knee.....for serious"
#19
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:54 PM
#20
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:04 PM
You know why Negroes can't QB in the NFL??? Because RG3 hurt his knee.....for serious"

You owe ALL of us an apology or an explanation.
#21
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:06 PM
And look at rg3 after he went down vs ravens....the "i told you so" clowns came out in bunches to use that as the reason to not like black QBs
You know why I hate Robert Griffin? Because he is a Redskin QB and I fuging hate the Redskins. I hate how Espn is setting this guy up as a do-no-wrong demigod. fug Griffin and the Redskins.
#22
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:07 PM
You owe ALL of us an apology or an explanation.
Does your reading comprehension suck today? I was making fun of OP and his statement.
In case you were directing this post at OP...I apologize.
#23
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:13 PM
You know why I hate Robert Griffin? Because he is a Redskin QB and I fuging hate the Redskins. I hate how Espn is setting this guy up as a do-no-wrong demigod. fug Griffin and the Redskins.
Completely agree. I deal with that first hand living in Maryland/DC area. Super bias to the extreme
#24
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:14 PM
Cam is less fragile and is smarter when running unless he's at the goal line or going for a 4th down conversion (then he will dive if necessary).
#25
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:25 PM
I thought it was clear. My bad. I know you well Flop, my being facetious comment has went against you and the clan.Does your reading comprehension suck today? I was making fun of OP and his statement.
In case you were directing this post at OP...I apologize.
I should stop drinking and posting.
#26
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:27 PM
I thought it was clear. My bad. I know you well Flop, my being facetious comment has went against you and the clan.
I should stop drinking and posting.
No worries brother. I didn't know what you were trying to say with your post.
#27
Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:34 AM
Cam had a broken finger nail earlier this year against Washington I believe...
I guess we all know who's built for running in the NFL
#28
Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:41 AM
Our defense has not sucked all year. What are you talking about?
That is my main issue with this team, example DEF plays horrible, Cam throws for 3 TD's with no turnovers and we lose to he Chiefs.
Inconsistency, one unit plays well, while the other does not. When we finally play good football in all phases of the game, we are going to be a very dangerous team.
#29
Posted 12 December 2012 - 03:59 AM
That is my main issue with this team, example DEF plays horrible, Cam throws for 3 TD's with no turnovers and we lose to he Chiefs.
Inconsistency, one unit plays well, while the other does not. When we finally play good football in all phases of the game, we are going to be a very dangerous team.
I think the most obvious and direct common denominator in the games the defense played poorly is the DT play. Pretty good reason to take Star or Hankins in the 1st
#30
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:22 AM
Agreed. Our rush defense is 21st in the in yards given up while our pass defense is 11th. having a stud DT and a beason Kuechly davis LB core would almost completely reverse that. our run d would be sickI think the most obvious and direct common denominator in the games the defense played poorly is the DT play. Pretty good reason to take Star or Hankins in the 1st
I will admit, the defense played well (except when we were in prevent for 2 drives in the second half) against Atlanta with Fua getting more playtime than I'm comfortable with, but Kearse stepped up like he did late last year and played well. I think Kearse is a very good backup, and with one of those two rookies starting beside Dwan our front 7 will be set for a long time. Then in 2 or 3 years when Dwan's ready to retire (or just falling off..), Kearse may be ready to step in as his replacement.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





