Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Elections over...here come the new regulations

33 posts in this topic

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_REGULATIONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-13-03-21-05

But since the election, the Obama administration has quietly reopened the regulations pipeline.

In recent weeks, the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed rules to update water quality guidelines for beaches and other recreational waters and deal with runoff from logging roads. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, meanwhile, has proposed long-delayed regulations requiring auto makers to include event data recorders - better known as "black boxes" - in all new cars and light trucks beginning in 2014.

Who's up for some car black boxes!

I'm sure the jobs are going to create themselves any moment now. Any moment now. Starting....now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some form of this has been in cars since the 90's. It's not a huge change at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics

1996: The OBD-II specification is made mandatory for all cars sold in the United States.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's for onboard computer diagnostics. Not recording of events leading up to crash. Voice? Brakes depressed at x, while running at x speed, mph at point airbag deployment=you were travelling at unsafe speed ticket/potential loss of license. Not that I'm minimizing the amazing amount of data that can be derived from it, but can be abused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah! Why should we give a fug about "water quality"!?

Hell! Republicans coulda created millions of jobs by now if they didn't have to dedicate so many resources to making sure the "Kenyan" was a one term president!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's for onboard computer diagnostics. Not recording of events leading up to crash. Voice? Brakes depressed at x, while running at x speed, mph at point airbag deployment=you were travelling at unsafe speed ticket/potential loss of license. Not that I'm minimizing the amazing amount of data that can be derived from it, but can be abused.

Personally, if I or a member of my family were in an accident I'd want to know what happened, even if it was tragic. Granted you do have a point that this can be abused especially by the insurance companies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah! Why should we give a fug about "water quality"!?

Hell! Republicans coulda created millions of jobs by now if they didn't have to dedicate so many resources to making sure the "Kenyan" was a one term president!

Why are you such a racist piece of poo?

Nothing stopped Obama from releasing these regulations prior to the election. Why didn't he.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's for onboard computer diagnostics. Not recording of events leading up to crash. Voice? Brakes depressed at x, while running at x speed, mph at point airbag deployment=you were travelling at unsafe speed ticket/potential loss of license. Not that I'm minimizing the amazing amount of data that can be derived from it, but can be abused.

If you've got nothing to hide (not driving like an asshole, or breaking the law - speeding) then you've got nothing to worry about....right?!?!?!

Isn't that your logic on all these invasion of privacy matters?

Ohh it's just that Obama is doing this and it's not being implemented to supposedly help hunt down brown boogie men, right? Gotcha.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's for onboard computer diagnostics.

That's just the 90's example. Most cars have event recorders already installed. GM actually started installing airbag event recorders in the 80's for fear of being sued.

More than 95 percent of 2013 model passenger cars already carry the “event data recorders,” according to estimates by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

http://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/emerging-tech-blog/2012/12/dot-wants-mandate-black-boxes-cars/60126/

If the NHTSA had not come out with this story you would have not known or cared about these recorders. The black box is likely just a standardized version of what is already installed.

Lt. Gov. Timothy Murray of Massachusetts found out the hard way last year.

He crashed a car he was driving and told police that he was wearing a seatbelt and was not speeding at the time of the crash.

However the black box installed in his car revealed he was actually speeding at 75 miles per hour in a 65 mile per hour zone, before accelerating to more than 100 miles per hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another ignorant racist statement from another piece of poo (floppin).

Do you all use a script? Given literary freedom to plug in whatever race qualifier you so choose?

As for the black boxes...I'm not for/against them honestly. It's just that it's now going to be a requirement. Governments have also floated the idea of highway taxation based on use. This could be used for that purpose.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah really dumb idea. Star players will be getting thrown out for incidental contact that the ref "misunderstands" as a helmet shot. The solution isn't adding more rules or "being stricter" so to say but enforcing the rules that are already established down the middle. Our games are evidence enough that the refs suck but damn I got tired watching other teams play and see the game decided on either bullshit flags or lack of flags. If anybody needs to be punished more it isn't the players but these POS refs the league can't get their heads noses out of the asses of. Always an excuse or some convoluted reason why the refs were right. I actually heard the announcers calling it out tons of these obvious blown calls and yet still the league stands behind the refs like idiots.
    • First I got to say, damn, people trying to instantly make us the most hated team in the league, even over the Patriots aren't they lol. With all the hate Cam already gets then add Kap even if briefly, oh lord I'd hate to picture it. Yeah that first play is what stands out to me the most. I'd expect even a rookie QB to make that read and throw the ball instead of handing it off. That drive ended up in a safety where as if he throws it to Torrey Smith it is easily a 1st down and possibly a TD as he only has to beat one man. I don't even see Kap look around any in that clip so even more so it feels like he gave it away that it was a run play and the Rams read it like a book. I don't feel like we need him nor do I feel like he is better than what we have. As for his protest, I didn't like what he was doing when he was kneeling but hey he had the right to do it. I personally think him putting his money where his mouth was, was a better way than just kneeling and I commend him for doing so. To be honest the 49'ers have said they would welcome him back. Let's not forget he would still be with them had he not voided his own contract. Somebody will sign him though I just don't see it as a starter which is what he clearly wanted to try and be by voiding with the 49'ers.
    • I feel like this is some kind of guilty admission lol and you should feel bad for voting for that Lunatic / traitor president of ours.    But guess what, you will get a chance to redeem yourself in 2020 with more information about the disgraced president  coming out every week.