Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

KaseKlosed

10 Christ-like Figures Who Pre-Date Jesus

60 posts in this topic

Christianity spread throughout the region. We know Paul traveled through those areas multiple times. So it doesn't matter whether or not Christianity was established in those areas, it was definitely there in Asia Minor.

I know Christianity spread throughout the region. At around 81 CE, when Peter's Letters were written about the persecution going on at the time.

These guys said they heard Jesus preach, and saw the things He did. I have good reason to believe what they saw truly happened. I look at the world today, and can see many of the things they talk about within ourselves. I also see the history of Israel, and how they were able to come back into the land after being exiled for so long. People might say the jewish people came back into the land because religious western countries helped them, well that is saying something if you ask me. That God's message spread so much, that it was actually His message that brought them back into the land of Israel. God used His word to bring about His promises.

Ultimately, everything lines up, and more evidence is being uncovered.

none of this stuff means anything at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know Christianity spread throughout the region. At around 81 CE, when Peter's Letters were written about the persecution going on at the time.

There was persecution when Paul preached in that area. I imagine Peter also travelled these roads as well. Now history may record some kind of great persecution in that area at that time, but there was always persecution everywhere they preached. I don't see the significance here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was persecution when Paul preached in that area. I imagine Peter also travelled these roads as well. Now history may record some kind of great persecution in that area at that time, but there was always persecution everywhere they preached. I don't see the significance here.

Really? You don't? I thought I was pretty clear.

Peter didn't write the Epistles of Peter. They were written at least 70-90 CE, though most scholars (historical and biblical) think centuries later than that. Almost no one argues that Peter could have written them.

Clear enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the purpose of Peter being chosen as one of the 12?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? You don't? I thought I was pretty clear.

Peter didn't write the Epistles of Peter. They were written at least 70-90 CE, though most scholars (historical and biblical) think centuries later than that. Almost no one argues that Peter could have written them.

Clear enough?

I don't know about that. Some argue because these letters were written mostly in Greek, the jewish disciples couldn't have written them. Yet we already know Paul was educated and had Roman citizenship. We know many people from different backgrounds became Christians within a short amount of time. (The preaching of Christianity began in 33 AD, and we know most of the letters in the Bible were written 20-30 years after that) Peter probably had a scribe with him to write his letters, as well as the other apostles. There's nothing within 1 Peter that says it was written much later than when Christ was on the earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I already pointed out the evidence that it was written later. The first recorded evidence or account of the persecution of Christians was under Domitian around 80-90 CE. There is no evidence it ever happened before that.

The first reference in all of Asian Minor to Christians there was by Pliny the Younger in 112 CE. He wrote Rome and said he'd had Christians in his lands for 20 years (90 CE) and asked for advice on dealing with them.

All these separate events all pointing to the same small timeframe for the beginning of Christian persecution match the content of the first epistle, and indicate it was written around 80-90 CE. There's no evidence that it was written earleir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't want me to get started on explaining Genesis. You wouldn't understand it, so I'll leave that alone for now.

Apparently...and congratulations on your knowledge about the subject as I basically just watch Passion of the Christ while listening to Dark Side of the Moon at the same time as my own biblical study.

I also know a lot about Homer's Illiad...but that is just a silly myth.

A serious question about Genesis: Do you prefer with Peter Gabriel or not? Id say with but you will never air drum better than me on "In the Air tonight"..don't get me started!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is zero concrete evidence that Jesus was who Christians believe him to be.

It is a matter of faith, as it should be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently...and congratulations on your knowledge about the subject as I basically just watch Passion of the Christ while listening to Dark Side of the Moon at the same time as my own biblical study.

I also know a lot about Homer's Illiad...but that is just a silly myth.

A serious question about Genesis: Do you prefer with Peter Gabriel or not? Id say with but you will never air drum better than me on "In the Air tonight"..don't get me started!

"You wouldn't understand it" was a very condescending thing for him to say, from someone who is unable to provide even a shred of evidence to back up their claim.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is zero concrete evidence that Jesus was who Christians believe him to be.

It is a matter of faith, as it should be.

But what about the Air Drumming to "In the Air Tonight?" That is real..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's not like Jesus then. I suppose we can say the American Revolutionary War didn't take place, because I found 20,000 fictional wars in the library just like it.

Logically, any similarities Jesus shares with past god's does not prove Jesus wasn't a true god or didn't exist.

However I do think extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I've NEVER seen anyone walk on water, raise from the dead, or be born of a virgin and . For me to believe such a thing I'd likely have to see it with my own eyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with the exception of Jesus in this list, which other person are some of you guys TRULY following? otherwise you are just throwing stones for no productive reason.

tell me about your walk with Hindu, or Buddha or any of the others. how have they transformed your life and what is about them that makes it attractive to me or anybody else here?

i got time. go ahead.

Walk? Such silly church talk.

Show me all the evidence that proves some spirit/god is changing you. Non-falisifiable claims are as worthless as whether or not those previous gods are similar to jesus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites