Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ladypanther

Ban weapons of mass destruction.....NOW

613 posts in this topic

Without that access...maybe a few more kids and maybe a teacher would be alive today.

Prove it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one possible reason he had access to these weapons, as has been talked about extensively, is that he shot and killed the legel owner of these guns. This could happen anywhere. He had been denied the sale of a rifle a week earlier, so he shot and killed someone for their weapons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, if a handgun is a WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, then I guess we were justified to invade Iraq after all.

The shooter used a semiautomatic rifle ( a military weapon). He shot one child 11 times. Please explain to me why anyone needs to have a right to own that kind of weapon? Then let me know how you would explain it to the parents of the 6 or 7 year old child that was shot 11 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The shooter used a semiautomatic rifle ( a military weapon). He shot one child 11 times. Please explain to me why anyone needs to have a right to own that kind of weapon? Then let me know how you would explain it to the parents of the 6 or 7 year old child that was shot 11 times.

a semi-auto rifle is not a military weapon. I think that you have no idea what you're talking about.

So you're saying it would have been ok if he'd used a single shot 20 gauge?

As to the last part, you keep asking that like its even relevant.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The shooter used a semiautomatic rifle ( a military weapon). He shot one child 11 times. Please explain to me why anyone needs to have a right to own that kind of weapon? Then let me know how you would explain it to the parents of the 6 or 7 year old child that was shot 11 times.

For argument's sake, the pistols were also semi automatic with multi round clips. He could have done just as much damage with the other two weapons he was carrying. Just because he choose to use the rifle doesn't validate your argument.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you're saying it would have been ok if he'd used a single shot 20 gauge?

Absolutely not. I said all weapons of mass destruction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For argument's sake, the pistols were also semi automatic with multi round clips. He could have done just as much damage with the other two weapons he was carrying. Just because he choose to use the rifle doesn't validate your argument.

I said all weapons of mass destruction...that includes all semi automatic weapons. Ban all clips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said all weapons of mass destruction...that includes all semi automatic weapons. Ban all clips.

But you just called a single shot 20 gauge a weapon of mass destruction. It doesn't have a clip.

Do you only want single bullet loaded weapons? Like one bullet at a time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the rub.

Emotion vs logic. Nobody wants this tragedy, but there are NO easy answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many parents of the murdered kids are responsible gun owners themselves. Surely out of 40+ people there's a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites