Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Who was Adam Lanza's Doctor?


  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#1 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,931 posts

Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:49 PM

http://jonrappoport....wn-connecticut/


This is phase two. It always happens at these mass murder events. The grief counselors. The social service workers. The psychologists.


They pour in. And they end up referring people to psychiatrists, who will in turn prescribe some of the very drugs that trigger murder and suicide.


The drugs that cause people to kill.


This is one way the psychiatric drug industry spreads its heinous influence.



If the school shooter was seeing a psychiatrist, we want to know who the doctor is, now. We want a list of all medications Lanza was taking, now.


We know these drugs’ effects. We know a number of psychiatric drugs cause brain storms that push people into committing suicide and homicide.


I just know this kid was on drugs with known side effects. Ban guns of you need but we also need to fix this issue.

#2 Wanderlai

Wanderlai

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,903 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 02:23 AM

Your spot on. Guns are just the tip of the iceberg in this problem.

#3 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,931 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:07 AM

And here it is. He was on fanapt.

Psychiatric side effects including restlessness, aggression, and delusion have been reported frequently.Hostility, decreased libido, paranoia, anorgasmia, confusional state, mania, catatonia, mood swings, panic attack, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, delirium, polydipsia psychogenic, impulse-control disorder, and major depression have been reported infrequently.



Read more: http://www.businessi...2#ixzz2FVTVNJdM

#4 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,891 posts
  • LocationRound about here

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:14 AM

There are not a lot of lobbiest that are stronger than the NRA, but the pharmaceutical ones have them beat.

#5 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,736 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:18 AM

Holy poo... if those are the negative side effects, wtf is that drug good for?

#6 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,891 posts
  • LocationRound about here

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:19 AM

^profits

#7 GAme

GAme

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:19 AM

psych drugs scare the poo outta me. Totally changes people

#8 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,670 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 December 2012 - 12:33 PM

But but if we have better access to health care and better mental care this won't happen.
What an insane drug and yes those psych drugs do more harm than good.
Let's get those guys at the gun regulation table.

#9 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:04 PM

But but if we have better access to health care and better mental care this won't happen.
What an insane drug and yes those psych drugs do more harm than good.
Let's get those guys at the gun regulation table.


more harm than good by what metric?


i agree with you largely... But psychotics and schizophrenics need their f*cking meds.

#10 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,512 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:43 PM

The pharmaceutical lobbies will do anything and everything in their power to prevent honest investigation on what their drugs really do, lest they be limited by good for society/bad for them regulations

The gun lobbies will do anything and everything in their power to prevent honest investigation on what their weapons really do, lest they be limited by good for society/bad for them regulations

Besides, at the end of the day it's about money for these guys. And these types of shootings are GREAT for business. Gun sales always spike after high profile shootings and doctors will be more apt to cover their asses by prescribing more meds.

#11 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,670 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 December 2012 - 02:03 PM

I agree del. Its like an old stock axiom. Buy on bad news and sell on good.

#12 d-run

d-run

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,363 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 03:57 PM

What exactly is anyone proposing in this thread?

During drug trials every potential side effect must be reported even if it cannot be attributed to the drug itself. When testing drugs that treat schizophrenia or other mental disorders, there tend to be lots of reports of psychiatric side effects because everyone in the test has psychiatric problems. Almost every drug has the potential side effect of the problem it is attempting to fix because of this.

There are very serious and scary side effects to some drugs, and the risk to benefit ratio has to be discussed between doctors and patients. What is more scary to me than these medications/side effects are people with no medical (and possible scientific) background discussing how drugs should possibly be restricted to patients. How many people who are dismissing Fanapt have ever read one of the clinical trials that have been performed on it?

#13 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,931 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 04:54 PM

What exactly is anyone proposing in this thread?


It seems like every mass murder involves psychotic drugs these days. That's all I'm saying.

#14 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,030 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 05:03 PM

It seems like every mass murder involves psychotic drugs these days. That's all I'm saying.



Correlation does not denote causation.



That's way too broad an assumption you're making. Almost as bad as linking wearing a shirt to mass murder simply because it seems like every mass murder is wearing a shirt these days.

#15 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,931 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 05:44 PM

Correlation does not denote causation.



That's way too broad an assumption you're making. Almost as bad as linking wearing a shirt to mass murder simply because it seems like every mass murder is wearing a shirt these days.


So let's run the regression analysis and tell me the predictive value of psychotropic drugs in school shootings. Fire up some correlations of coefficients.

And then compare that to shirt color or any other variable over the last decade or so.

When is the last school shooting that didn't involve the killers being on these drugs?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.