Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Floppin

Floppin's Sandy Hook Thread - You knew it was coming.

402 posts in this topic

Sorry ... the apparent source of the faked family/actors ... these people are looney tunes of the first order:

http://wellaware1.com/fairfield.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the "end the life of adam" from the police scanner audio. I would assume that this was a separate transmission that was just picked up by the police car scanners. Such as a walkie talkie transmission that was in close range. The next assumption would be that this was from the special ops group inside that was performing the task at hand.

you think a spec-ops team would broadcast over public channels without using any code? You think they'd literally use the perp's first name to identify him? maybe in a movie.

police scanners and walkie-talkies don't operate on the same frequencies. you wouldn't accidentally pick one up while listening to the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you think a spec-ops team would broadcast over public channels without using any code? You think they'd literally use the perp's first name to identify him? maybe in a movie.

police scanners and walkie-talkies don't operate on the same frequencies. you wouldn't accidentally pick one up while listening to the other.

Correct, unless there was also one in the car/close by the officer that was keyed up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, unless there was also one in the car/close by the officer that was keyed up.

so the small town connecticut police are in on staging a school shooting and abducting/killing kids?

a stretch too far.

also, that audio byte only says "end the life of adam" if you go into it with serious confirmation bias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you think a spec-ops team would broadcast over public channels without using any code? You think they'd literally use the perp's first name to identify him? maybe in a movie.

police scanners and walkie-talkies don't operate on the same frequencies. you wouldn't accidentally pick one up while listening to the other.

Yeah, there were a lot of assumptions. Regardless of the source, the audio is clearly there. It got there somehow, Whether it was by someone near a police car with it's mic turned on and it got picked up, someone talking on the same channel, or otherwise. It's there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so the small town connecticut police are in on staging a school shooting and abducting/killing kids?

a stretch too far.

also, that audio byte only says "end the life of adam" if you go into it with serious confirmation bias.

It's pretty clear what is said. Even at full speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, there were a lot of assumptions. Regardless of the source, the audio is clearly there. It got there somehow, Whether it was by someone near a police car with it's mic turned on and it got picked up, someone talking on the same channel, or otherwise. It's there.

it's not clearly there. that may be the best you can make of it but as someone who works with audio for a living... it's most definitely not "clearly there."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty clear what is said. Even at full speed.

Actually, it's not very clear at all ... a whisper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it's not very clear at all ... a whisper.

It's at a lower volume but it's not a whisper. Turn your sound up. It's fully audible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty clear what is said. Even at full speed.

you seriously believe that a team of professional killers would use public airwaves and the perps first name while ordering his execution?

are you high? or do you think the intarwebz is that much smarter than world class operators?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
    • Assholes should've never taken it away in the first place.  Me and a couple buddies had a hookup and were all hyped up and planned out going to it... then the NBA had to get all political and take it out on the city of Charlotte and the fans -- which made no fuging sense.  Seriously doubt we'll even get the chance to go again.
    • 6'6" 255.  He'll definitely have some good mentors with JP, CJ and the rest of the D-Line crew. 255 he'll need to put some weight on don't you think?