I am not arguing whether there is anything to the second Gunnar or not. Only that the reporting of this and then nothing could just as easily been yet another example of the media jumping the gun as a cover-up.
Using the situation as evidence of anything is a bit presumptuous.
I'd like to take this time to apologize to Floppin. In another thread you mentioned the government throwing people out of windows after spiking them with LSD. I said it was a farce. While I still am not sure about the whole government/big bank plots and all this, the facts you have presented here at least have opened my mind to the possibility that these aren't simply acts of crazy people, but linked events that stem from something bigger.
So again, I apologize.
It's going to be interesting to see how you and others handle it when you realize 1) We've been right this entire time, 2) Youve been living a lie your entire life, and 3) How lost you really are in your understanding of life, the world, and reality.
Um...Hey venom
It's going to be interesting to see how you and others handle it when you realize 1) We've been right this entire time, 2) Youve been living a lie your entire life, and 3) How lost you really are in your understanding of life, the world, and reality.
I quote all of you for this reason...
We can't continue to box each other into the roles and paradigms we've grown accustomed to living in.
As the old saying goes, "there are two sides to every story, and the truth lies somewhere in between."
So often, and the Tinderbox is a great simulator of this, one side is convinced they are right and paint the other one as completely nonsensical windbags on the verge of delusion - republican vs. democrat, conservative vs. liberal, religious vs. non-religious, conspiracy theorists vs. reasonable, informed non-crazy realist, lol... The list goes on and on.
Truth is, in my approach, I choose to look at each and every event objectively. I don't let someone else define it for me. I gather what I can from every source possible, and then I make my own conclusion.
The two-sides adage fits the bill in this case as well. I have my ideas as to what happened, you have yours. Truth is, none of us know, but the truth is 100% somewhere in between. You can best believe the media is not reporting the truth and of course, on the other side, all evidence contrary to what the media reports are assumptions and inductive reasoning, so you choose your path and go from there, IMO.
I just think it's safer to look at things objectively, make your conclusion, and prepare to be moved from your original position than just buy what someone else tells you.
