Ron Rivera Should be Given a 3rd Year
#16
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:26 AM
The people wanting him back are the same ones that furiously called for his head the first half of the season.
Huddle logic in full effect.
#17
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:30 AM
#18
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:31 AM
#19
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:32 AM
#20
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:37 AM
ever hear of oakland?
Please tell me, how is that working out for them?
#21
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:42 AM
Please tell me, how is that working out for them?
better than us since 2009
#22
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:46 AM
better than us since 2009
Playoffs, oh no? So I guess their sh*t and we're sh*ttier. Doesn't really matter how you put it, we both suck but ours isn't because we go through coaches like underwear.
#23
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:47 AM
Finishing strong was nice, but why start winning once the schedule gets soft and the games no longer matter? I'm not buying it.
Everyone is forgetting we were one of the worst teams in the league and it took 10 + games before the coaches decided to make changes. What are the people that want him back going to say when we start sucking again when the season begins next season? I don't trust this coaching staff enough to give them another year.
#24
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:51 AM
Everyone is forgetting we were one of the worst teams in the league and it took 10 + games before the coaches decided to make changes.
That and getting the GM fired.
#25
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:51 AM
There's a lot involved in changing coaching staffs. Replace him and you force Newton to start over from scratch. Even if it's a similar system, you still have to expect some adjustment. And that comes just as Newton seems to be hitting his stride with the new system.
My guess at this point is that Rivera will get a third year. It'll likely be considered an 'audition' season.
And I can live with that.
#26
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:53 AM
Playoffs, oh no? So I guess their sh*t and we're sh*ttier. Doesn't really matter how you put it, we both suck but ours isn't because we go through coaches like underwear.
mark out for ron just a little bit harder
#27
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:55 AM
#28
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:58 AM
If we're going to make keeping the losing coach a job stipulation for the new GM you may as well just promote a company man who can run the numbers like Beane and be done with it.
Thus far he's done a fairly good job, and to be honest I wouldn't be surprised if J.R. gave him the job because he would definitely be cheaper than most and definitely cheaper than Ross.
#29
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:59 AM
Thus far he's done a fairly good job, and to be honest I wouldn't be surprised if J.R. gave him the job because he would definitely be cheaper than most and definitely cheaper than Ross.
oh my god seriously
#30
Posted 17 December 2012 - 01:01 AM
oh my god seriously
Not trying to sound snobby, but I work in a college football office so I do have a pretty good idea of what it takes to run a football team.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





