Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ThunderKatt

Did Cam have a sophmore slump or did Chud?

43 posts in this topic

I ask this question because the coaching staff tried to say they added too much to cams plate and that's part of the reason why the offense struggled. I think that's classless to place the blame on someone that you know is protected with the team.

Cam accepted blame, but I think he has some class.

So why would the coaching staff throw cam under the bus like he can't comprehend or that he doesn't have the football savvy? I don't understand it, look at flacco, he struggles but he isn't getting throw under the bus by a coach that drafted him and allows him to stay in games. Rec isn't slaughtering Sanchez and we all know he suck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chud has too big of a playbook that no QB in history could operate under. Once he got rid of the high school plays and condensed it down and started running just plays that work in the NFL Cam took off.

edit: Just saw who started this thread and am mad at myself for giving a serious response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's a legit question.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe he had a slump. He had a learning curve. Flacco isn't struggling because he wasn't a rookite last year. Cam is still learning and some areas he might not learn fast enough (footwork) and some areas he mastered quickly. The point is too many people included most of this forum have too high expectations for Cam. He is still learning, but his cieling is so high it's worth the time to let him learn. He came into the NFL with more to learn than say Luck. A LOT more to learn. SO far he has proven that 1. He will learn it, he does have the ethic to be great and 2. It is worth every second to take time with Cam so that he learns things properly.

No slump, I don't believe it at all. He just needs more time to learn which we all knew when he was drafted. You simply can't take a running QB who played for ONE year and expect him to learn at the same pace as someone who played for four full years or even three. Doesn't mean the other QBs are better at all.

Cam needs more time but his raw talent is out of this world, and prevents him from a 'slump' IMO, it jsut needs to be molded and it will because he has the ethic for it to happen. BUT it WILL still take time.It's not about being football savy etc. its about being young, having limited playing/learning time in college, originally being a non traditional QB, and about learning.

The coaching did not help Cam but to blame it all on the coaching is rediculous, Cam has made a lot of mistakes, some that have cost the entire game one could say. That said, the coaching took too long to get their head out of their ass IMO so I'd like to see them gone but if we win out, I'd be willing to keep them here...on a short leash.

Regression toward the mean. Cam is still better than I thought our new rookie QB would be at this point.

holy crap long post wake n bake

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt Cam had a slump first half of the season. Cam was underthrowing short passes and getting a lot of passes knocked down at the line of scrimmage. Can't really blame those things on the offensive coordinator. He was also thowing picks or fumbling at inopportune moments. He has improved over the last 6 games, especially irt the turnovers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

both.

cam had a bit of a regression early on making dumb mistakes, thinking about too much, and trying to do too much.

chud tried changing too much to quickly, tried changing things to something he didn't know how to run and ended up making things too complicated. he tried helping cam by trying to make it easy on him and take decision making away from him. his biggest sin, tho, was in not recognizing early enough that what he was doing wasn't working and then taking too long to go back to the things that worked well last year and that cam and the offense was already comfortable and confident in.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^this

Also the past 5-6 weeks, Cam says that he has been extra careful in protecting the football from turnovers.

But if you had to pick one guy to blame for the terrible start, you have to pick Chud. He tried to fix something that was never broken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can look at the pass that Cam threw against Seattle into the dirt at the 1 yard line and see that his mechanics were way off. He was throwing 10 feet over the receivers head missing wide open guys and playing poorly. Secondly how many times has Newton come back in the last 5 minutes of a game to win it on a pressure drive. I can't think of many at all.

Chud for his part was using the read option too much and it just didn't work.

They both had quite a bit to learn. Hopefully they have and we are on the right track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was a bit of both. But you'd have to put the majority of the blame on Chud for his playcalling.

For some reason, it was like Cam was against checking down. Even when a guy was right in his face - wide open - he'd chuck it 40 yards down field for an incompletion. He's starting to hit his checkdowns a lot more now and it's helping to keep drives alive.

However, no one can be blamed but Chud for having your QB lead the team in rushing yards, and rushing attempts up through like week 10. That is an absolutely ridiculous stat in the NFL. If it was Navy or Army, I'm okay with it. But if someone told me an NFL team's leading rusher was their QB, my thought would be that team didn't win one game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both.

When Chud stopped messing, and Cam stopped pressing, the offense was no longer perplexing.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • http://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/fbi-isis-garland-texas-shooting-undercover-agent The first attack on U.S. soil for which ISIS claimed responsibility—a 2015 shooting in Garland, Texas—was instigated by the FBI, according to an investigation by CBS' "60 Minutes" and government documents obtained by an attorney involved in the case. In a macabre twist, an undercover FBI agent who encouraged one of the shooters to "tear up Texas" was also physically present at the scene of the crime, mere feet away from the shooters. Prior to that, a separate informant was paid $132,000 by the FBI to pretend for three years to be friends with the future shooter. When the man found out his supposed friend had taped more than 1,500 hours of their conversations on behalf of the intelligence agency, he withdrew from his religious community and eventually fell into online religious extremism. ...... On May 3, 2015, two Islamist extremist gunmen opened fire at an exhibit for cartoons of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas. The contest featured key figures in the Islamophobia industry, including anti-Muslim demagogue Pamela Geller and extreme-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders. The intentionally provocative exhibit was swarming with security, including dozens of police officers, snipers and a SWAT team. The heavily armed attackers injured a security guard outside the building before they were themselves promptly shot by snipers and killed. ISIS soon after took credit for the shooting. There is no evidence that ISIS organized the attack, but the shooters had been independently radicalized and were inspired by the genocidal extremist group. In the two years since, the Garland shooting has been used to justify a vast array of anti-Muslim policies and measures. A new investigation by the investigation team at "60 Minutes," nevertheless, shows that the FBI was deeply implicated in the attack. ..... After the trial, Maynard was given 60 pages of declassified messages between an undercover FBI agent and one of the shooters, Elton Simpson. These documents showed that, less than three weeks before the attack, the FBI agent had told Simpson to "Tear up Texas." This "to me was an encouragement to Simpson," the attorney told "60 Minutes." The government denied that the text constituted incitement, but the FBI's involvement did not end there. "60 Minutes" reported that the U.S. government admitted in an affidavit that the undercover FBI agent also physically "traveled to Garland, Texas, and was present ... at the event." "I was shocked," Maynard told the news program. "I was shocked that the government hadn't turned this over. I wanted to know when did he get there, why was he there?" Documents the government gave to the attorney showed that the FBI agent had in fact been in a car behind the two shooters at the time of the attack. The undercover FBI agent even used his cell phone, several feet away, to film the building's security guard seconds before he was shot by the Islamist extremists. "It's stunning," Maynard told "60 Minutes." "The idea that he's right there 30 seconds before the attack happens is just incredible to me." ..... The undercover FBI agent fled the scene of the crime before being stopped at gunpoint and detained by Garland police. ..... Dabla Deng, the informant, pretended to be Simpson's friend for three years, "60 Minutes" reported. Deng taped more than 1,500 hours of their conversations. When Simpson "found out that this guy was spying on him, and taping him and then finding out that the government was doing that, I think something clicked in him," recalled Usama Shami, president of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix. "And the mosque, we couldn't do anything." "He felt that the mosque had abandoned him?" Anderson Cooper asked. "Yes. And he felt that a lot of people had abandoned him. And that's why he stopped coming to the mosque," Shami said. After this, Simpson moved in with his friend Nadir Soofi, who "60 Minutes" noted "had just had a bitter break-up and the pizza parlor he owned was going out of business." The two alienated men drifted into extremist religious communities online, and were attracted by ISIS recruiters.
    • i actually took this test a year ago because i was talking to this girl who was a psych major and really invested in this test. then i was talking to this other girl who was also a psych major and she thought there wasn't much to it, she basically didn't have respect for it. if i took it today it'd probably line up the same. 
    •    There isn't a problem taking a tackle usually. The problem would be taking any of THESE OTs that high. If there was someone close to that, we would have risked so much on Kalil.