Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:35 AM
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:37 AM
Clausen. I think that Clausen is twice the QB that Sanchez is, and I think that Clausen sucks ass.
Clausen > Sanchez --- not a compliment to jimmy
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:46 AM
Another reason that wins are not a quarterback statistic. Mark Sanchez has 4 playoff wins.
this should be chiseled at the base of a marble statue
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:04 AM
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:29 AM
I mentioned that if Clausen was put in a situation like Sanchez where the offense was around him that he would be just as good. The jets made that offense simple for him. He had a great OLINE, running game, receivers and a great D. He didn't have to do much. Clausen could've succeed for the Jets two years ago.
Whoever drafting Barkley will be damn dissapointed also. Everytime I look at Matt Barkley, he reminds me so much of Clausen. People talk about how they have an arm and can make all the NFL throws, I just don't see it. Clausen, Sanchez and Barkley all have weak arms.
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:52 AM
Would you rather have a guy who rarely moves the chains but seldom turns the ball over (Clausen), or a guy who can hit some throws but gives it to the other team more than his own (Sanchez)?
I'd take Clausen. Jimmy can hand off all game and not fumble. Can't say the same for Marky Mark.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users