Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

beastson

Nfl.com Writer Mentions Our Future

44 posts in this topic

To me he disappears in games to much.He is making just shy of 3 receptions per game which is not enough for a possession receiver.Moose was my idea of a good number 2 wr with over twice the receptions of LaFell and averaging close to 800 yards per game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This dude goes Casper in too many games to be a number 2. Panthers fans have got their expectations so low that they think LaFell is a number 2? Come on fellas. Right now in a number two we are looking for a replacement for Smitty and someone that WE KNOW can get 1,000 yds receiving. Do we have that with LaFell? Absolutely not.

Someone finally agree with me on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the author states "the new guy will likely want to install his own systems and schemes", he assumes this is a detriment to the team and that staying the course with failed systems and schemes is better. Furthermore, it does NOT consider the poor clock management skills exhibited by RR. This is biased AND misleading reporting unworthy of serious consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need whoever finds wr's for the Giants they always plug in some scrub and bam he is a star...

Marc Ross for GM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone finally agree with me on this.

Yeah no one else has been saying this about Lafell ever.

You're the only one Chuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah no one else has been saying this about Lafell ever.

You're the only one Chuck.

Well for whatever reasons, when I was calling him out early of the season no one backed me up. I didn't see you there making this argument with me did I. It was only me vs 20+ members.

And can y'all huddlers quit acting like y'all know me by calling me by my name. Gosh it sounds horrible. Call me by my user name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe him going Casper has something to do with the game plan. Even if you have two good recievers, doesn't mean they are going to have similar stats. We all know Olsen is good, but he went two or three games with low numbers. i am not saying that Lafell has not dissapointed at times(namely the KC drop), but seven hundred recieving yards is not an easy accomplishment. Especially when we are trying to force feed Smitty through out the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for whatever reasons, when I was calling him out early of the season no one backed me up. I didn't see you there making this argument with me did I. It was only me vs 20+ members.

Made a few threads earlier about him and many of the replies saying he went ghost often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I'm going to be fuging pissed when we lose Sunday. I've been to a game with my gf 4 times: 30-27 L to New Orleans, 30-3 L to Tennessee, 31-23 L to Atlanta and 26-13 L to Houston. I'd like to see us fuging win a fuging game in fuging person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moose was my idea of a good number 2 wr with over twice the receptions of LaFell and averaging close to 800 yards per game.

Yes, I remember that 12,000 yard season he had.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites