Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

carolina-chuck 2013 Mock Draft v5.0

54 posts in this topic

Posted

Mckelvin is the only thing I like, just because I don't see hunter falling. It's still early though, of I brought up some mocks from this time last year ya'll would laugh.

Richardson is starting to get popular, but he reminds me of fletcher cox last year. If we're gonna go d-line I wanna nose tackle.

Appreciate your kind FB related comments. Richardson does have some Cox and I think McCoy in him. Richardson will rise increasingly. Im with you on wanting a NT but drafting top15 is pretty much taking BPA. I just dont think Jesse Williams or a Jon Jenkins (NT) is worthy of being a top15.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Williams stock is going to fly up boards after the combine like Poe last year. Williams isn't all combine numbers though, can actually play.

I'm leaning towards receiver or corner though. Maybe o-line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Williams stock is going to fly up boards after the combine like Poe last year. Williams isn't all combine numbers though, can actually play.

I'm leaning towards receiver or corner though. Maybe o-line.

Yea he have been rising as of lately but I just don't know if it'll get him into the top15. If we're going DT, I just don't think Rivera will fall in love with him over a Richardson.

I'm okay with a receiver or olineman, but if we could land a OG like an Alvin Bailey or Uzzie in the 4th I may rather go that route. Possibly even getting one through FA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Double post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Couple of my friends are pats fans and say Chung is not good in coverage, plus he plays SS so why not put him there? Plus dwan is a 3-tech not a NT, I'd rather get a big NT than another 3-tech(Richardson)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Couple of my friends are pats fans and say Chung is not good in coverage, plus he plays SS so why not put him there? Plus dwan is a 3-tech not a NT, I'd rather get a big NT than another 3-tech(Richardson)

Like I said Chung is not one of my favorite player but money wise, he'd be a good pickup. Chung loss his job this season to someone and the Pats had to move McCourty to Safety.

I really do think Dwan can be decent as a NT. He has experience playin in a 34 D with Baltimore, which I think he'll be able to play the Nose. Teams like Minny and Philly are running two UTs. Not the best but it can work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Chung is the worst in the business against the play action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Chung is the worst in the business against the play action.

We talking money here though, "money". Chung is the cheapest we'll be able to afford. These Byrd talks can quit already.

Whos worst against the play actions, Naka or Chung?

In a right system, maybe Chung can redeem himself. I see Chung like a Thomas Decoud. Decoud isn't a good safety. I believe he's very overrated. Similar size and game imo. Decoud is just a notch better at this point bc of what Nolan is doing down there with different looks and coverages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We talking money here though, "money". Chung is the cheapest we'll be able to afford. These Byrd talks can quit already.

Whos worst against the play actions, Naka or Chung?

In a right system, maybe Chung can redeem himself.

Exaclty.

I rather have Chung than Nakumaru,say what you want about Chung he is a upgrade over that midget bum Nakumaru.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Exaclty.

I rather have Chung than Nakumaru,say what you want about Chung he is a upgrade over that midget bum Nakumaru.

Yup, no one should be complaining if in a wonderful world we landed Chung. He's an instance upgrade over both Naka and Sherrod. Would instantly upgrade our secondary. For the price, I'd take him all day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't want Richardson. Dwan and Neblett are UTs, not NTs. If our starting DTs are Dwan and Richardson, sure we'll get a few sacks from the DT position every now and then, but teams are going to keep running up the middle on us. They'll just scheme away from them. It would definitely be in the vein of the Jim Johnson scheme, but I'd rather get Star or Hankins in the 1st or Jesse Williams or someone comparable in the 2nd and have someone to plug that middle.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Chung is garbage. Dwan is NOT a NT. He's a 5 tech in a 3-4 and a UT in a 4-3. I like Woods, but id rather have Patterson. Think

theres more of a ceiling to him.

Edit: Hunter not Woods. Geting my WR mixed up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites