Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

SCM Mock 1.0


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#11 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,328
  • Reputation: 1,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 01:21 AM

Yeah I like thomas in the 2nd also but for moving back a bit we'd be out of range for warmack so I figured with the way rookie cap is why not grab the need earlier.

We have to get into the 3rd round it just must be done.


I just don't think it would cost 10 spots in the 1st and 2nd rounds just to pick up a third... Moving down 10 spots in the first alone should get us at least a 2nd...

#12 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,708
  • Reputation: 442
  • LocationValdosta Georgia
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:31 AM

I just don't think it would cost 10 spots in the 1st and 2nd rounds just to pick up a third... Moving down 10 spots in the first alone should get us at least a 2nd...


I think about it this way .. in the 1st 20 or so picks you are sure to find a starter. the next 7 you are likely to find one so 10 spots to be able to tap into this deep secondary draft is a price i'd be willing to pay. Teams are stingy about picks unless you're cleveland or Atl So I feel like swapping 1st and 2nd with another team for a 3rd is somewhat realistic and it's not as bad as it seems. I would def rather only have to swap 1sts for a 3rd though.

#13 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,328
  • Reputation: 1,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 02:42 AM

I think about it this way .. in the 1st 20 or so picks you are sure to find a starter. the next 7 you are likely to find one so 10 spots to be able to tap into this deep secondary draft is a price i'd be willing to pay. Teams are stingy about picks unless you're cleveland or Atl So I feel like swapping 1st and 2nd with another team for a 3rd is somewhat realistic and it's not as bad as it seems. I would def rather only have to swap 1sts for a 3rd though.


When I get home in a couple days I'll do some research but I'm away from any computers right now (I'm on my phone) I promise you it shouldn't take that much to just get a third. I would instantly hate our new GM if he came in and gave up 20 draft spots just to get a 3rd round pick. A late third at that.

#14 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
  • LocationSouthern California
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 03:08 AM

Oh this is bad. And gamecock homerness is showing.

#15 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,708
  • Reputation: 442
  • LocationValdosta Georgia
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 03:13 AM

Oh this is bad. And gamecock homerness is showing.


I assure you I could have done a lot more in that department. But actually see through the homer and you'll find that the team is helped equally on both sides of the ball in areas of need and also found a kicker. hazzah.

#16 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
  • LocationSouthern California
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 04:19 AM

That first pick would absolutely ruin the draft for me.

#17 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,708
  • Reputation: 442
  • LocationValdosta Georgia
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:29 PM

That first pick would absolutely ruin the draft for me.


Because of who it is or where it's happening? The guy is good?

#18 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:41 PM

Because of who it is or where it's happening? The guy is good?



Dont worry SCM. If we were able to trade back, Id be fine with taking Dallas Thomas .
Bwood just have a huge crush on Joeckel and wont believe that no other Tackles after Joeckel is worth taking. Dallas is a beast and could really be taken in the 1st.

#19 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,708
  • Reputation: 442
  • LocationValdosta Georgia
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:46 PM

Dont worry SCM. If we were able to trade back, Id be fine with taking Dallas Thomas .
Bwood just have a huge crush on Joeckel and wont believe that no other Tackles after Joeckel is worth taking. Dallas is a beast and could really be taken in the 1st.


Joeckel is a top 5 pick so him being mad it's not Joeckel wouldn't really be plausible in this situation. I'm not worried about it just curious as to how a solid player could ruin a draft for someone when we need O-line help something serious. I was thinking it was because almost everyone wants a DT.

#20 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:56 PM

Joeckel is a top 5 pick so him being mad it's not Joeckel wouldn't really be plausible in this situation. I'm not worried about it just curious as to how a solid player could ruin a draft for someone when we need O-line help something serious. I was thinking it was because almost everyone wants a DT.

No it's not bc everyone want a DT. I want a DT badder than anyone else on this board and im fine with Dallas depending on if we were to trade down and take him mid to late. Any position could be taken from that point bc we have so much needs. It only matter what you take in the top 10, after that you could really take whoever you want and it wouldn't hurt a bit.

Dallas is very athletic that if we took him, we could move him to RG.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users