Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

fieryprophet

Raiders Admit They Were Targeting Cam

60 posts in this topic

http://www.thescore.com/home/articles/403916-dt-kelly-admits-the-raiders-went-after-qb-newton

Looks like Cam had some reason to be pissed.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why I'm glad he reacted the way he did....dirty cheap shots....JV type twisting an ankle in a pile...that'w why Cam gave him the royal kick....loved it! Still he could be ejected....would've been worth it today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldn't this warrant fines/suspensions?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldn't this warrant fines/suspensions?

I thought the same thing. Doesn't this fall into, almost, the bounty suspensions of trying to cart players off the field?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But oh no! Cam was immature today!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that last game it looked like the chargers were trying to twist his legs in a pile.

dude has been targeted lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Intentionally targeting a player with the intent to injure. Should be a fine, suspension and an apology to Cam for whomever admitted to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This shouldn't matter to the media. They know everything about what was happening. The Raiders were just playing nice and being good sports about everything until Cam lost his cool. It's cause he doesn't know how to lose, you know.

A good QB sits there and takes hit after hit and all the extra-curricular activity.

I think it's really just the fact that Cam isn't physically scared of these big defenders. Normal QBs don't start poo because they know they can't defend themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Haven't even broken a sweat yet 
    • You don't have to agree but you have to treat them equally as you would the rest of the public if you are going to offer services to the public.  You don't want to bake a cake for a gay wedding don't offer your wedding cake services to the public.  Simple as that  They aren't asking you to participate in homosexuality. They aren't asking you to go to bed with them   They are asking to bake a cake or do a job you make available to the rest of the public.  When you refuse to accommodate them because of their race or sexuality you are participating in intolerance.  Or better word is oppression. People have used religious rights arguments for slavery, segregation, and opposing mixed marriages.  All of which can be reasonably agreed upon as acts of intolerance.
    • Had we had a defense worth a damn his rookie season its possible we could have won the whole damn thing. After that the O as a unit went downhill fast.