Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SZ James (banned)

Facebook Politics

593 posts in this topic

xTLLg.jpg

dude who posted this is an insane libertarian who for some reason was also heavily involved in occupy charlotte for a few days until he eventually melted down over the fact that the occupiers weren't going to start some violent revolution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

disinfo campgain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

uIq3F.jpg

ugh

i have heard this is false because it's vastly oversimplified but i've never heard anyone explain what's fundamentally wrong with it... care to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard this is false because it's vastly oversimplified but i've never heard anyone explain what's fundamentally wrong with it... care to?

there are tons of articles out there on this. the key points can be found here: http://rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/federal-budget-not-household-budget-here-s-why

1) families can't levy taxes on hundreds of millions of people

2) debt isn't an inherently bad thing when it comes to government. the US government has been in debt for all but 2 years of its existence, and a government running at a profit is a government not sufficiently meeting the needs of its citizens (because government isn't supposed to be run like a business). no debt tells me that we are either not spending enough or taxing too much. the end game of starve the beast, after gutting social security, medicare, and medicaid, is to suddenly point out that we're not running a large deficit anymore so we should just cut taxes again!

3) historically, significant reductions of the debt have directly led to depressions

4) "The federal government is the issuer of our currency. Its IOUs are always accepted in payment." basically, if your household is millions of dollars in debt, good luck getting someone to accept an IOU from you

this article doesn't even begin to touch on the reality that government spending stimulates the economy (this is why a call for austerity during a recession/depression is the dumbest fuging thing ever). government spends money -> money circulates throughout the economy -> government collects higher revenue -> government spends that money -> so on -> so forth. show me a household that can operate in that manner

there's more to it than just this but i'm not an economist so if you're interested in more, there are plenty more resources on the topic, simply because people continue to perpetuate the myth that the government budget is equivalent to a household budget

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i readily admit that i am retarded when it comes to economics. i'm pretty well versed in various economic philosophies but the i'm embarrassingly lacking on a lot of the nuts-and-bolts aspects, so i try to not be a loudmouth about these sorts of things. thanks for the links.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

541721_10151411574558784_1387491515_n.jpg

Sooo... You don't take anti-biotics when you have a virus, wash your hands with anti-bacterial soap or hand sanitizer, or even WORSE, kill mosquitos/spiders when they near you? They're all "living cells"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are some pretty good, accessible books out there that can make you at least a little more confident in discussing econ stuff

http://www.amazon.co...d/dp/1848139926

http://www.amazon.co...h/dp/0745318576

that being said, my own understanding of econ suffers due to an early adherence to a couple of flawed schools of thought (in other words i haven't always been the most leftist leftist to ever leftist and for that reason i am still a little behind where i should probably be at this point)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all the Obama Memes on there today... at least this one's funny...

demotivational-posters-your-husband.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    •     Now don't take this the wrong way, but....are you two nuts? Now, if the kid didn't have those injury issues, maybe I can get on board. But man, those petite WRs with injury issues in college? Those guys scare the living poo outta me.   Now get me a Ross clone and I'm on board. Someone for the slot that could actually, you know, scare a Defense. Now that would tickle my giddy like nobodies bidness.
    • IMO, it is obvious, to me anyhow, that the kid has matured. He has taken heat for standing up for what he believes, and has done it the right way. No snarky comments to the press. Keeping his head down, and working toward a goal. He has brought to light injustices not only in our country, but in others as well. His foundation just contributed over a million and a half dollars to the Simolian relief effort.   All that is admirable to be sure. And he can play football as well, or better, than enough QBs to earn himself a shot at a job.   It is not the football side of his life that is keeping him off teams. Almost every team hates distractions. It is just how it is. And Kaep is a walking distraction at this point in time.   I would like to add that another thought could be that at this point in FA, no one is being signed. OK, maybe a better way to put that is, FA spending has slowed considerably.   If teams head to Training Camp and he is still unemployed. Then I may start believing in conspiracies.
    • lol lol lol fahey watched every snap of every game and graded the quarterbacks as he saw it. kaepernick is a fine game manager who was let down repeatedly by perhaps the shittiest set of skill position players in the league and oh yeah he can run like the wind. you've got to be pretty stupid to think this is anything but a quarterback starved league blackballing a serviceable quarterback all because he had the audamndacity to protest racism in america and tbh i've not seen one post itt that would cause me to even begin to question that.