Fug Barney. Olsen nice though.
I wouldnt mind a developmental / diamond in the rough OT or DE in the 4th though.
24 replies to this topic
#17
BigSyke
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,858 posts
I Know you Watching me but I'm watching you too Playa...
- LocationFLORIDA
Posted 25 December 2012 - 10:00 PM
lol.....okay im checking daniel mccullers from the vols... he a dt about 6'8 and 350.......projected around 3-5.
#18
Dash Global
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,571 posts
Member
Posted 25 December 2012 - 11:30 PM
6'8 DT would wouldnt get low enough and lose leverage imo.
#19
Bwood
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,491 posts
It's all about the
- LocationSouthern California
Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:00 AM
Agree with big syke. Drafting a TE is absolutely ridiculous but we don't have to worry since our front office isn't dumb enough to waste that pick, just like last year when everyone was sold that we would draft a TE.
It's like a weird fetish around here lol...
It's like a weird fetish around here lol...
#20
Dash Global
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,571 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:33 AM
Id be perfectly fine without a TE in this draft. But im not a fan of Barn and id like to use more 2 TE sets, not to mention I like the guy as a prospect.
As long as we build the trenches and come away with a nice skill player (DB or WR) ill be happy.
As long as we build the trenches and come away with a nice skill player (DB or WR) ill be happy.
#21
Bwood
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,491 posts
It's all about the
- LocationSouthern California
Posted 26 December 2012 - 05:36 AM
Id be perfectly fine without a TE in this draft. But im not a fan of Barn and id like to use more 2 TE sets, not to mention I like the guy as a prospect.
As long as we build the trenches and come away with a nice skill player (DB or WR) ill be happy.
What's your beef with Barney? He barely ever gets utilized, but when he does he either gets a big first down, or score a TD like against Philly.
#22
Dash Global
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,571 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2012 - 05:47 AM
Prob due to the defense ignoring him. He isnt on Olsens level. I want two legit stud TEs. Barn will have to put some nice numbers consistently before id be happy or even content with him.
#23
JawnyBlaze
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 5,205 posts
Senior Member
Posted 26 December 2012 - 07:24 AM
Prob due to the defense ignoring him. He isnt on Olsens level. I want two legit stud TEs. Barn will have to put some nice numbers consistently before id be happy or even content with him.
People were saying similar things about Hardy the past two years, even worse probably.
#24
Dash Global
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,571 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2012 - 08:13 AM
People were saying similar things about Hardy the past two years, even worse probably.
Difference being Hardy is a pretty darn athletic. Not sure if classify Barns as athletic....
#25
La Pantera
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,849 posts
humpin' habanero
Posted 26 December 2012 - 04:56 PM
6'8 DT would wouldnt get low enough and lose leverage imo.
Watched several Vols games this year. Mccullers ate up 2-3 blockers on most plays. Hes not getting in the backfield, but thats not a NTs job. I'd jump all over him if hes available in the 4th.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
