Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr. Scot

Setting aside the "Newton vs Luck" stuff...

60 posts in this topic

http://50.116.44.142/qba/player/A.Luck

See all the purple games? That's all you need to know about Luck and the Colts winning in spite of him this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope to god that Luck doesn't come in and make a SB run. We won't hear the end of it from the Luck supporters in the huddle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://50.116.44.142/qba/player/A.Luck

See all the purple games? That's all you need to know about Luck and the Colts winning in spite of him this year.

I also see that Luck has been under 50% completion percentage for his last four games. And five games this year.

Hmmmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://50.116.44.142/qba/player/A.Luck

See all the purple games? That's all you need to know about Luck and the Colts winning in spite of him this year.

PFF also have him rated negatively as a passer, ranked 26th of 39 qualifying QBs. In addition when adjusting his accuracy statistic by counting drops as completions and removing spikes, throw aways etc then he is 34th out of 39 in accuracy.

The only thing pundits are looking at is his game winning drives, which is obviously important but looking at his as a passer he isn't anywhere near rg3 or Wilson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst homers in the NFL, folks. Right here.

We're the best homers in the NFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

put a minimum attempts in there at 50 or 100 or something, imo.

100 attempts for what? If you're talking about the season rankings single game players are marked with an asterisk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100 attempts for what? If you're talking about the season rankings single game players are marked with an asterisk.

eh, I just prefer a cleaner list than that, but a matter of preference. I could tell who had single games from the asterisk but there just seems to be no reason to leave them on the season rankings really, though I can understand why you wouldn't want to arbitrarily assign some minimum number of attempts I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eh, I just prefer a cleaner list than that, but a matter of preference. I could tell who had single games from the asterisk but there just seems to be no reason to leave them on the season rankings really, though I can understand why you wouldn't want to arbitrarily assign some minimum number of attempts I guess.

Well, my problem is that you can narrow the dataset to single weeks, which would mark everyone as outliers because no one would have had more than one game. I'll think of something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a big deal, I applaud your effort, neat little stat you have :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From where i am, i always feel like the Texans are a kind of mafia, everything Texan rocks and everything else sucks.

This feeling is especially strong on the nfl and espn websites.

They will prize and prize again Luck, Romo Manning (colt) etc. but the remaining QBs/players are just foils

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Colts are playing well above their talent level. I doubt they can sustain another season like this unless Luke really is Manning 2.0. A lot of their players wouldn't be starting on other teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites