Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

MtnJax

Alamo Bowl

11 posts in this topic

if Alex Okafor is available in the 3rd or 4th, we need to grab him and shore up our DE rotation. Just set the Alamo Bowl sack record with 4.5

CJ

Hardy

Alexander

Okafor

Also had 2 forced fumbles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What?

We have too many glaring needs that need to be addressed and DE isn't one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have too many glaring needs that need to be addressed and DE isn't one of them.

Has that stopped the NYG from drafting them? If we get Marc Ross as GM, he could be bringing that mentality with him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's gone by the 2nd. Possibly even 1st.

I think I saw somewhere where the compared Okafor to Peppers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Won't even sniff the 3rd round. Gone late 1st/early 2nd. Maybe even higher after his performance tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marquise Goodwin is definitely someone to look at.

PS: we have no 3 rounder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell I'm on the Mario Addison bandwagon, I'd let that kid get more reps and see what he has got before I go and use a second rounder on a defensive end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.