Wait....are we discussing Tiger Woods?
Maybe.
You know, Tiger is weird... He seems like he has a pretty good group of friends... He might be alright if you're friendly with him... He's just an asshole to everybody esle.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 07:51 AM
Wait....are we discussing Tiger Woods?
Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:37 AM
I guess I'm glad you think this team has so much potential, and with Nash it's what. 5 games in?
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:33 PM
What I like about this thread is that the Lakers are 1 game out of the playoffs, and sub-.500, with possibly the best team ever assembled.
And Laker fans are trying to say that is a good thing.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:15 PM
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:20 PM
5 rings for Kobe? I thought the Lakers fans already added another one after they traded for Dwight.
But good luck building around Dwight Howard 2.0, the one with chronic back problems
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:07 PM
Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:31 PM
Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:00 PM
Dwight Howard is the best center in the NBA. But when he only gets 10 shots a game it is hard to tell.
BTW I am not sure how me saying that Kobe is a top 20 at worst player of all-time is bashing Kobe. All i am saying is that he would be better and his team would be a lot better if he averaged closer to 22 points a game instead of shooting 30+ times a night to get his 25-30 points.
The reason the Lakers were so successful with Shaq is because he was a dominate center getting @18 shots a game.
This Lakers team should be the best in the NBA. But they won't until the offense starts running through their low post players and Steve Nash in the pick and roll.
As long as the offense consists on Kobe Bryant dribbling around hunting his own shot they are going to struggle or at the very least play well below their talent.
But hey, maybe you guys can keep firing coaches and trying to blame them.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 12:02 AM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 02:28 AM
Serious question... have you watched a Lakers game this year? If so, have you watched more than 1 or 2?
First you say that Steve Nash has played all season, then you said that Kobe is taking 30+ shots every night to get 25-30 points, as well as some other totally false stuff. It's hard to take you seriously if you can't at least act like you don't absolutely despise Kobe.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 02:54 AM
Why would I despise Kobe? I have watched several Lakers games as I have watched Kobe over nearly 17 seasons.
It makes absolutely zero sense that Kobe Bryant averages nearly twice as many shots per game as Gasol and Howard combined.
When you look at the Heat, Lebron is averaging 18.7 shots per game, Wade averages about 15.4 shots per game, and Bosh averages 12.3 shots per game
In LA Kobe averages 21.8 shots pers game, Gasol averages 11.6 shots per game, and Howard only averages 10.7 shots per game.
Unless those numbers start to even out, the Lakers are not going to reach their full potential. Because how can you team reach its full potential when there is only one guy taking all the shots?
There is a reason why a guy like Lebron can take a team whose second best player was Antwan Jamison (the guy who doesn't even get off the bench in LA because they are so talented) and lead them to 61 wins, but Kobe with two all-star post players is struggling to get to .500.
All I am saying is that Kobe is great, he just tries to do too much, and it usually hurts his team.
PS- When you account for Kobe's shots that result in free throws, he is shooting close to 30 times a game. I definitely exaggerated to make a point though, so for that I apologize.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:14 AM
It makes absolutely zero sense that Kobe Bryant averages nearly twice as many shots per game as Gasol and Howard combined.
In LA Kobe averages 21.8 shots pers game, Gasol averages 11.6 shots per game, and Howard only averages 10.7 shots per game.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:26 AM
Touche'Did you fail basic fuging math? Since when is 21.8 nearly twice of 22.3 ???
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:37 AM
Touche'
I think I typed that around 2:30AM so maybe you can cut me a little bit of slack.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users