My whole concept is, if you go by that logic then you might as well say Flacco, Sanchez, The Golden Calf of Bristol are better than him too because they took their teams to the playoffs early in careers. Stupid logic.
it comes back to this ridiculous preconceived notion a lot of people have in their heads about "winners" and "losers".
it's an unbelievably stupid, simplistic way to look at a thing as complicated as quarterbacking in the NFL. the guy we just watched, matt schaub, has been houston's starter for six seasons and elevated that team out of complete irrelevancy but this is his first win as a starter in the playoffs. guys like The Golden Calf of Bristol, sanchez, and flacco all got wins before him but only a complete dumbass would dare argue that schaub is inferior to those three.