Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 4 votes

Dear media, please stop telling me Andrew Luck is good


  • Please log in to reply
234 replies to this topic

#76 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 17,481 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 06 January 2013 - 06:55 PM

Rg III, Wilson, and luck are like bacon, eggs, and toast. Sure, they're all good and you might like one better than the other two, but Cam still eats them for breakfast.

#77 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    We dominated time of possession though!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,968 posts
  • LocationChapel Hill

Posted 06 January 2013 - 06:56 PM

all i know is i kinda like winning games and going to the playoffs. if you make a comparison of any other qb to Cam you get well yeah but that team has a good d or they have AP or they have a nice stadium or whatever. stop with the excuses.


so are we to just assume that every team that doesn't make the playoffs for any reason should just "quit whining" and blame it on the quarterback then?

#78 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,950 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 06:59 PM

You know you dont have to base your opinion of a player based on what the media says about the guy, right?

And saying "I dont like Luck because the media praises him all the time" is admitting that you let the media influence your opinion. Just mute the TV if it annoys you that much.

Luck is a slightly below average NFL QB. Which happens to be really fuging good for a rookie

#79 mcribbz

mcribbz

    Lookin' 4 a qb

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:03 PM

U guys take the cake. no announcers, no coaches, no one knows poo but you. luck is gonna be an above average qb. meanwhile we are still stuck with a coach that is terrible and a qb that is vastly over rated by this fanbase. leave your basement fellas the real NFL is out there and you guys are such homers your are missing what's real. oh poo now I'm gonna get hit with a slab!!

#80 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,985 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:12 PM

so are we to just assume that every team that doesn't make the playoffs for any reason should just "quit whining" and blame it on the quarterback then?



not all. my point is within the context of this thread, guys are minimizing what Luck has done. i'm merely pointing out that then if that's the case, you must be satisfied with NOT going to the playoffs.

think about how dumb we look as a fan base. we have multiple threads dogging Luck or RG3 or Wilson and yet....they...are in the playoffs. last time i checked that was the ultimate goal of each team in Aug. unless we are content with stats like fantasy nerds, well then we should be happy each year.

we even had one guy in here saying the Colts were behind BECAUSE of Luck.lol. are you serious?

i don't care if Cam ever goes to another Pro Bowl or gets the credit he should as long as we just win. thats all that matters.

#81 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,417 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:21 PM

If Indy WRs are below average....so were Cam's. He did it with less attempts


fewer attempts.. I keep hearing that

I will agree that the receivers are about the same, and stats don't lie as far as attempts go.

However, the difference here and what helped Cam a bunch is his athletic ability and his backfield support. The ability the likes of which Luck can only dream of and Double trouble to the tune of 50 million dollars (give or take)

so the fug what if it was fewer attempts. I am not comparing the two. Cam's record is gone none the less and Luck had a FANTASTIC rookie year.

why are you people so insecure that you cannot admit such a commonly known and simply understood fact?

get the fug over yourselves. Cam is better IMHO but Luck is very good.

#82 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    Sell it, Jerry

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,417 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:30 PM

If only the media would slurp every last bead of sweat from Cam's nuts. Then threads like this would never happen.

#83 CCS

CCS

    Glutton for heart break and punishment

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,413 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:36 PM

I really get tired of the Luck ass kissing. I'm sure he's a nice guy but the media really kills him to me. I remember in one of our games the announcers just randomly starts talking about how Andrew Luck will be breaking all of Cam's records. It makes you want to smack the poo out of them.


I've always said that Luck being hyped is a race thing and I still believe that. There's absolutely no reason why Luck should be viewed in a better light than guys like Cam/RG3.

#84 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,270 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:36 PM

fewer attempts.. I keep hearing that

I will agree that the receivers are about the same, and stats don't lie as far as attempts go.

However, the difference here and what helped Cam a bunch is his athletic ability and his backfield support. The ability the likes of which Luck can only dream of and Double trouble to the tune of 50 million dollars (give or take)

so the fug what if it was fewer attempts. I am not comparing the two. Cam's record is gone none the less and Luck had a FANTASTIC rookie year.

why are you people so insecure that you cannot admit such a commonly known and simply understood fact?

get the fug over yourselves. Cam is better IMHO but Luck is very good.

I don't give a poo about the record. Records fall all the time. But with all records you look at the new guy and compare the differences. Like Dickerson and OJ's rushing seasons....people can beat them but it is always worth noting they put the numbers up in 14 games.

#85 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,333 posts
  • LocationLa Grange, NC

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:38 PM

fewer attempts.. I keep hearing that

I will agree that the receivers are about the same, and stats don't lie as far as attempts go.

However, the difference here and what helped Cam a bunch is his athletic ability and his backfield support. The ability the likes of which Luck can only dream of and Double trouble to the tune of 50 million dollars (give or take)

so the fug what if it was fewer attempts. I am not comparing the two. Cam's record is gone none the less and Luck had a FANTASTIC rookie year.

why are you people so insecure that you cannot admit such a commonly known and simply understood fact?

get the fug over yourselves. Cam is better IMHO but Luck is very good.


Luck is supposedly just as athletic, and our RBs have been laughable through Cam's career. You're literally diminishing what Cam has done to make Luck look better.

#86 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,270 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:39 PM

fewer attempts.. I keep hearing that

I will agree that the receivers are about the same, and stats don't lie as far as attempts go.

However, the difference here and what helped Cam a bunch is his athletic ability and his backfield support. The ability the likes of which Luck can only dream of and Double trouble to the tune of 50 million dollars (give or take)

so the fug what if it was fewer attempts. I am not comparing the two. Cam's record is gone none the less and Luck had a FANTASTIC rookie year.

why are you people so insecure that you cannot admit such a commonly known and simply understood fact?

get the fug over yourselves. Cam is better IMHO but Luck is very good.

I don't give a poo about the record. Records fall all the time. But with all records you look at the new guy and compare the differences. Like Dickerson and OJ's rushing seasons....people can beat them but it is always worth noting they put the numbers up in 14 games.

#87 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,244 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:42 PM

The guy threw for well over 4000 yards and 23 TDs carrying the full load of the offense with little running game to help. The guy averaged almost 40 attempts per game as a rookie. That's absurd.

You're just hatin'.


Last year when Cam had 21 passing TDs and 17 ints it was noted by all the "experts" that that was very weak and just a sign on how much he would need to improve AS A PASSER.

Oh, by the way, Cam's "low" 60% completion rate last year was ANOTHER sigh by all the "experts" about how much he needed to improve AS A PASSER.

Andrew Luck this year has had 23 passing TDs and 18 ints with a 54% completion rate and you and the "experts" can't seem to get off of his knob.

#88 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,985 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:43 PM

you know what? i bet if the Colts were not in the playoffs today, you would not have all these threads and you wouldn't have heard more things about Luck.

see how that works?

#89 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,950 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:43 PM

Last year when Cam had 21 passing TDs and 17 ints it was noted by all the "experts" that that was very weak and just a sign on how much he would need to improve AS A PASSER.

Oh, by the way, Cam's "low" 60% completion rate last year was ANOTHER sigh by all the "experts" about how much he needed to improve AS A PASSER.

Andrew Luck this year has had 23 passing TDs and 18 ints with a 54% completion rate and you and the "experts" can't seem to get off of his knob.


So what?

#90 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,417 posts

Posted 06 January 2013 - 07:43 PM

Luck is supposedly just as athletic, and our RBs have been laughable through Cam's career. You're literally diminishing what Cam has done to make Luck look better.



diminishing? no.

I am a fan of Cam first and foremost. I'm just pointing out how ridiculous you insecure bastards are by stating commonly known facts. Even you ignorant morons should understand that Cam is more athletic than Luck (come the f-ck on already) and that our backfield is MUCH better than anything luck has ever had.

Even if everything else was equal this is enough to validate his accomplishments.

Stop trying to project on me what you are doing because this entire moronic thread is about tearing down what Luck has accomplished. It takes a real f-cking idiot to try to turn it around now that someone has cast a little light on your butt-hurt complaining over lack of media-hype or whatever the f-ck you idiots are whining about today.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com