All we heard last offseason was how Cam needed to improve as a passer. Luck has virtually the same stats minus the rushing yds & tds, but with a much lower completion %(60 per to 54 per) and you hear none of that with him. It is just assumed he's going to improve. Why is that I wonder?
You even have people on here, and other places who concede and say Cam will never be a surgeon or such. Well based on Lucks stats this year, it's safe to assume Luck will never be that either.
the last time the media ran with Cam needing to improve as a passer was the time frame between his national title and the final game of his rookie season (or before). If anyone even mentioned it in passing they can not be taken seriously and any intelligent person would have immediately discounted it.
Media parrots, msuh-brained as most of them are, rarely suggest that guys that end their rookie campaign at 60% and break rookie yardage records have to get better as if its life and death like you clowns are contending. Plenty will say they need to continue improving or stay on track (which is exactly what they said) but nobody will (and nobody did) say there needed to be improvement in the sense that he was condemned a bad passer.
I realize you guys, like most huddlers, are insecure adolescents who are not intelligent enough to handle when we lose and why and therefore lash out like a bunch of butt-hurt wolfpackers atttempting to tear others down because you simply cannot rise on you r own,so I am not surprised at much of this. I jsut have to call it what it is.... f-cking stupid.