Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Salary Cap


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#11 ThunderKatt

ThunderKatt

    Hello to All my Haters

  • Joined: 23-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,073
  • Reputation: 40
  • LocationIn yo moma
HUDDLER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:19 AM

Yeah, Beason was injured and that's why his stock has fallen which means if he opts to take his guaranteed money and leave, he will be lucky to make 2 mill a year.

As for Deangelo, I don't see him making more than 2-3 mill a year if he decides to leave so he has more incentive to stay. I think Chud has learned his lesson and rr looked dumbfounded during the huddle when mixon or Robinson pointed out that deangelo still has it so for some reason I don't see williams being demoted anymore.

jmo




#12 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,138
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:22 AM

Yeah, Beason was injured and that's why his stock has fallen which means if he opts to take his guaranteed money and leave, he will be lucky to make 2 mill a year.

As for Deangelo, I don't see him making more than 2-3 mill a year if he decides to leave so he has more incentive to stay. I think Chud has learned his lesson and rr looked dumbfounded during the huddle when mixon or Robinson pointed out that deangelo still has it so for some reason I don't see williams being demoted anymore.

jmo

Was that your opinion prior to the last game of the season? One game shouldn't drastically change Williams' fate.

Williams has little reason to restructure....nor does Carolina have much of one. You don't throw big cash in a restructure at a 30 yr old RB....THAT creates more of the same issues we are faced with now

#13 ThunderKatt

ThunderKatt

    Hello to All my Haters

  • Joined: 23-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,073
  • Reputation: 40
  • LocationIn yo moma
HUDDLER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:28 AM

Ive been pulling for Williams all season and my twitter account proves that. So you would rather pay out close 5 mill a year for nothing instead of keeping him for 5 mill a year? If you say yeah then you are a troll, if you think Stewart can carry the.team then you wish death upon our constant play off hopes.

#14 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:35 AM

While we're talking about the cap, everyone needs to keep in mind that we have to be in compliance with the cap in March. So when we talk about June 1st cuts or trades, keep in mind they won't do us any good in the short term. We are going to have to get under the cap long before June 1st.

#15 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • Joined: 27-February 10
  • posts: 3,507
  • Reputation: 1,644
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:37 AM

Maybe Chud doesn't use Williams right.....but that doesn't change the fact we are paying too much at RB.

We paid 2 RBs BIG money....then have Tolbert and Cam is the best rusher on the team. Even if Williams was used right....he shouldn't be on the roster. Too many highly paid RBs...that money should of been invested elsewhere ( his or Stewarts)


If deangelo was used correctly, nobody would be complaining....

And about this salary cap hooplah this poo happens with us every year and we somehow ALWAYS turn out ok, I'm not saying we won't cut or trade a few vets (even d-will or beason, if need be, although I hope not) and that we won't be limited in FA obviously but the overreaction that happens every year about this is ridiculous IMO..

#16 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 01:44 AM

If deangelo was used correctly, nobody would be complaining....

And about this salary cap hooplah this poo happens with us every year and we somehow ALWAYS turn out ok, I'm not saying we won't cut or trade a few vets (even d-will or beason, if need be, although I hope not) and that we won't be limited in FA obviously but the overreaction that happens every year about this is ridiculous IMO..


Yes, but you are forgetting one small, minor detail. We usually have a general manager to work these things out. We haven't had one since October.

#17 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • posts: 2,969
  • Reputation: 1,501
  • LocationSan Diego
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 04:00 AM

While we're talking about the cap, everyone needs to keep in mind that we have to be in compliance with the cap in March. So when we talk about June 1st cuts or trades, keep in mind they won't do us any good in the short term. We are going to have to get under the cap long before June 1st.


You can cut a player prior to June 1st and still designate them a June 1st cut. See Travelle Wharton last year.

#18 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 11,999
  • Reputation: 964
  • LocationLexington, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 05:31 AM

You can cut a player prior to June 1st and still designate them a June 1st cut. See Travelle Wharton last year.


Yea, but the cap space isn't freed up till june 1st.

#19 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,138
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 08 January 2013 - 07:22 AM

If deangelo was used correctly, nobody would be complaining....

And about this salary cap hooplah this poo happens with us every year and we somehow ALWAYS turn out ok, I'm not saying we won't cut or trade a few vets (even d-will or beason, if need be, although I hope not) and that we won't be limited in FA obviously but the overreaction that happens every year about this is ridiculous IMO..


Sure they would....bc even if used correctly there are not the touches to justify his and Stewart's contracts.

Teams don't pay 2 backs bc you can't get your monies worth.

Add in Cam Newton and Tolbert and you have just gone full retard.



#20 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:41 PM

You can cut a player prior to June 1st and still designate them a June 1st cut. See Travelle Wharton last year.

Yea, but the cap space isn't freed up till june 1st.


96 is right. All it really does is give the released player a chance to hit the market early.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users