Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

You hear that sound?

68 posts in this topic

Posted

The problem is, Stew still has $11 million dollars in guarantees that he has yet to receive, plus another $7 million dollars yet to hit our cap from his signing bonus. So we just flat can't cut him or we'd go from being $16 million over the cap to being $34 million over the cap.

Moving DWill on the other hand, frees up $5 million in cap space this year if we do it after June 1st, either through trade or a cut. That is going to be tempting to Gettleman.

Should we find someone willing to take on Stew's guaranteed money, then yeah, you could make a case for trading him even though he is much younger. It just seems unlikely to me that we'll find a trading partner. Bottom line, I expect DWill to be gone and Stew to be here. Not saying I like it, just it seems the more likely.

Ahh, right. Stew's deal is still relatively new, so there's still the guaranteed to be factored in. Man, that's unfortunate. Otherwise, he'd probably be able to draw some pretty decent trade value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Left Tackles don't grow on trees. So unless we have a viable backup option, you don't trade Gross.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Left Tackles don't grow on trees. So unless we have a viable backup option, you don't trade Gross.

You might, if you think you can replace him with our 1st pick in April.

The problem is, we are going to have to do something (re-negotiate, trade, cut) Gross before the league year starts in March, long before the draft. It's a sticky situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You might, if you think you can replace him with our 1st pick in April.

The problem is, we are going to have to do something (re-negotiate, trade, cut) Gross before the league year starts in March, long before the draft. It's a sticky situation.

If we had a top 5 pick and could be assured to draft a LT who could start right away sure. But other than that, you don't touch your blindside tackle unless you don't like your QB and are going to be drafting another next year imo. Restructure the deal? Sure if possible. Cut? Completely out of the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't think Jimmy Clausen is going anywhere. Derek Anderson's contract is up. Cutting Jimmy doesn't save much compared to keeping him instead of resigning Anderson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't think Jimmy Clausen is going anywhere. Derek Anderson's contract is up. Cutting Jimmy doesn't save much compared to keeping him instead of resigning Anderson.

except there is zero benefit to keeping clausen.

he doesn't fit what we do.

not sure he even fits in the NFL.

if we don't retain anderson (which we should) then we pick up a coryell style QB or a big armed read option/mobile QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

except there is zero benefit to keeping clausen.

he doesn't fit what we do.

not sure he even fits in the NFL.

if we don't retain anderson (which we should) then we pick up a coryell style QB or a big armed read option/mobile QB.

I'm not saying I want Jimmy being our back up. It would scare the hell out of me. Just with how tight we are going to be with the cap and tough releases at other positions, I can see one scary season with Cam and Jimmy as our only QBs, unless we draft one in late rounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If I were an overpaid vet I would welcome being cut. With all the guaranteed money they will get, they can sit around and do nothing and still be a multimillionaire. If they want they can go to another team and get paid from both like Jake did. No guys like Williams aren't crapping themselves, just waiting for the golden parachute.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Speaking of quarterbacks, was Gettleman the guy who decided to pick up David Carr as their backup when we cut him. Yeah well if he did, it raises questions..............................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Speaking of quarterbacks, was Gettleman the guy who decided to pick up David Carr as their backup when we cut him. Yeah well if he did, it raises questions..............................

they wanted to get an inexpensive veteran backup QB in a very thin market at that time and missed out on their first two (at least) options before settling on carr. their QB coach was Carr's OC for his first 4 years in the league so that might have played a part in it as well.

that said...it's not like they were trying to get a starting QB or get a QB to fill in for an injury prone QB. it was just a guy they could plug in in case of emergency not a big deal and definitely not something to discredit gettleman or even question his abilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

going back to teh jimmy, i saw that he has a year four escalator written into his contract worth 2.85 mil. anyone know what triggers it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

going back to teh jimmy, i saw that he has a year four escalator written into his contract worth 2.85 mil. anyone know what triggers it?

hopefully playing time or stat related.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites