Gettleman and "trouble" players
#1
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:57 AM
I hope that with a new GM like Gettleman that we can look to all oppurtunity to bring in the most talented guys into this organization. I would love to know that Gettleman won't be passing on a player of Da'Rick Rogers caliber just bc of his previous problem. Gettleman, don't pass up on Da'Rick!
Thank you.
#2
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:24 AM
#3
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:25 AM
#4
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:32 AM
#5
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:35 AM
#6
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:13 AM
#7
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:47 AM
#8
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:55 AM
#9
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:03 AM
Rae Carruth casts a very big shadow.
I hear Jerry Richardson keeps one of his piss bottles in his office on top of the mahogany hutch on his desk in the office as a message to all the players
#10
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:12 AM
Talent should never be used as an excuse to overlook character. Doesn't matter how talented a guy is, if he's gonna eff up a locker room, don't bring him in
'Trouble' guys and 'bad character' guys aren't always necessarily one and the same. There are guys like Rolando McClain, who is a true goes back to his old hood every offseason or break he gets type guy, that gets into off field trouble and causes locker room problems; then there are guys like Ray Lewis who got into pretty much the worst trouble possible, but is widely considered the best locker room guy of all time.
I like high character guys, but if a guy that's talented but has maybe made a couple off field mistakes as a kid is available, I hope our new regime will have the authority to start at least taking a closer look.
#11
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:27 AM
#12
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:51 AM
So where does Rogers rank on the thug meter, huddle?
He's not really a thug. I don't recall him getting in trouble off the field. His issue is the fact he's an absolute pain to deal with in the locker room. It's saying something when you are as talented as he is and still manage to get suspended for something that isn't related to getting in trouble with the law. Apparently was not liked at all in the locker room.
It'll really come down to interviews, so none of us will really know how teams feel about him until draft day. To be honest, I think his issues will be looked at more harshly than say someone who just gets caught with drugs. But I do think Rogers is extremely talented. Just nobody really knows what to expect from him and his personality.
I wouldn't mind him in the second if the team feels in interviews he's going to change but I will say I doubt it'll be long until problems arise between him and Smitty.
#14
Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:22 AM
thinking the same thing.We missed out on a player with a troubled past by one pick last year. It would've been interesting to see if Janoris was available would he have been our pick
lockerroom cancers should be avoided. that wasn't jenkins. people with a sketchy past who have gotten in trouble off the field shouldn't be ruled out outright. if they worked hard to improve their situation, like jenkins did, they should be seriously considered, esp. if the talent was there.
#15
Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:30 AM
We missed out on a player with a troubled past by one pick last year. It would've been interesting to see if Janoris was available would he have been our pick
Agreed.
I actually think that we would have pulled the trigger on him.
How sweet a draft of Keek and Jenkins would have been.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






