If Chud gets HC job, should that make Rivera dispensable?
#1
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:52 PM
#2
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:54 PM
#3
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:09 PM
Chud isn't going anywhere. No one is dumb enough to hire him as HC, not even the Browns.
I have faith that the Browns can find the absolute stupidest way to do something, regardless of how implausible it seems.
#4
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:10 PM
The biggest argument for keeping Rivera was "We dont want to harm Cam by learning a new playbook and risk stunting his growth." Well if we have to get a new OC, guess what? Cam will have to learn a new playbook and would risk stunting his growth. So my question is simple, if Chud goes and Cam and the offense has to learn a new system anywaym why would we keep Rivera again? I know JR is honorable and probably wouldnt fire Rivera this season now anyway, but what a slap in the face if Chud goes and the main reason of keeping Rivera would be moot.
I've seen Oliver Stone films with less conjecture.
#5
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:12 PM
#6
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:28 PM
#7
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:31 PM
#8
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:05 PM
One has nothing to do with the other. Rivera has always been a defensive guy not an offensive guy. Besides, do you think that Norv and Chud are the only guys who understand how to run a Coryell style offense.If Chud leaves and we can't get Norv, what's really the point of having Rivera then?
Seriously?????
#9
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:10 PM
Rivera is a defensive mind...the type who can help turn an overall average lot into a top 10 D.If Chud leaves and we can't get Norv, what's really the point of having Rivera then?
Also, Rivera has the lockerroom...which is important. He also is a good X's and O's guy.
Plus, he seems to be good w/ Cam and forward thinking.
....Rivera just needs a good OC and to slightly more aggressive in spots.
#10
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:13 PM
One has nothing to do with the other. Rivera has always been a defensive guy not an offensive guy. Besides, do you think that Norv and Chud are the only guys who understand how to run a Coryell style offense.
Seriously?????
No, but Rivera choices in coaches has been iffy at best. I predict Shula if the scenario were to happen
#11
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:19 PM
#12
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:26 PM
#13
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:29 PM
No, but Rivera choices in coaches has been iffy at best. I predict Shula if the scenario were to happen
Chud and Rivera have been good choices. Picking coaches is really a timing thing. He kept Meeks for example because the guy he wanted, Wilkes wasn't available. When he was, he picked him up.
#14
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:46 PM
and id say our secondary was better this season than last...Chud and Rivera have been good choices. Picking coaches is really a timing thing. He kept Meeks for example because the guy he wanted, Wilkes wasn't available. When he was, he picked him up.
#15
Posted 10 January 2013 - 05:41 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





