Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

There is No Confirmation on Norv Going to the Browns


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#31 GRWatcher

GRWatcher

    visiting from Kepler-186f

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,332
  • Reputation: 592
  • LocationStatesville
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:31 AM

Bob Frantz@FrantzRants
Voice of Browns Jim Donovan confirmed to me tonight that Norv Turner WILL be joining Rob Chudzinski as Off. Coord of the #Browns#wtam1100



Joe Person@josephperson
As for Norv, @FrantzRants said the Browns play-by-play announcer told him Chud mentioned bringing Norv with him in his interview w/ Browns.





Frantz Rants is Cleveland talk radio/reporter

#32 P-paw

P-paw

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 265
  • Reputation: 21
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:35 AM

Frantz Rants is Cleveland talk radio/reporter

Well damn!

#33 ThunderKatt

ThunderKatt

    Hello to All my Haters

  • Joined: 23-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,073
  • Reputation: 40
  • LocationIn yo moma
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:47 AM

If Turner doesn't come, then the OC will be Mike Shula, and oh by the way, Chud left his 900+ page playbook behind. So who needs Chud, lol!

#34 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,726
  • Reputation: 1,833
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:49 AM

The audacity of Chud lol, trying bring Norv with him huh? LOL

Rivera, I KNOW you not having that

#35 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,898
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:51 AM

chud smarter than ron.

its official.

#36 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 7,417
  • Reputation: 5,437
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:55 AM

For those with more knowledge than I, are we assuming it'll be a Coryell guy because that's what we've had recent (moderate) success with? Are we assuming they don't want a complete offensive change? Makes sense but I was just wondering why you feel it's limited to those kind of OC's?

#37 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,432
  • Reputation: 3,528
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:56 AM

At least we're not the browns

#38 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,726
  • Reputation: 1,833
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:57 AM

For those with more knowledge than I, are we assuming it'll be a Coryell guy because that's what we've had recent (moderate) success with? Are we assuming they don't want a complete offensive change? Makes sense but I was just wondering why you feel it's limited to those kind of OC's?


With all of our damn running backs we should be a power running offense

#39 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 7,417
  • Reputation: 5,437
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:58 AM

Frantz Rants is Cleveland talk radio/reporter


So Cleveland's talk radio guy was part of their HC interview process?

#40 magnus

magnus

    Eternal Gameface

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,388
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:59 AM

For those with more knowledge than I, are we assuming it'll be a Coryell guy because that's what we've had recent (moderate) success with? Are we assuming they don't want a complete offensive change? Makes sense but I was just wondering why you feel it's limited to those kind of OC's?

continuity, but also best fit for Cam/Smith/Olsen because of the deep ball.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users