Hey fellas..It's gonna be ok
#16
Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:51 AM
#17
Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:54 AM
There is no proof we are doomed.
#18
Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:57 AM
#19
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:01 AM
Anybody that doesn't run the read option 100 times a game against the most athletic defenders in the world, Craig!! The world!If we land Norv than yes, Chud can take a hike. If Chud gets Norv, I will say letting him go was a mistake because I don't see a better alternative.
#20
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:02 AM
Anybody that doesn't run the read option 100 times a game against the most athletic defenders in the world, Craig!! The world!
Top Flight Security.
#21
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:08 AM
#22
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:13 AM
We lost to teams with good defenses. They shut down that read option and Chud wouldn't adjust. Other than the Giants and Denver all we needed was one more scoring drive to win. That's a fuging 14-2 record
It's funny because every team in the NFL can say this too.
#23
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:16 AM
I think a lot of the freaking out is because keeping Rivera really only had one large plus - continuity. Now that that plus is gone, we're looking at a scenario where the offense needs to learn possibly two systems in two years.
The good thing about Cam and why most of us wanted him here was because of his ability to improvise on broken plays. His decision making has greatly improved and the rest of the offense are seasoned vets that can gel in the offseason. Unless someone comes in with a system wilder than Chud's I wouldn't be too worried.
#24
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:25 AM
The good thing about Cam and why most of us wanted him here was because of his ability to improvise on broken plays. His decision making has greatly improved and the rest of the offense are seasoned vets that can gel in the offseason. Unless someone comes in with a system wilder than Chud's I wouldn't be too worried.
I'm not that worried honestly. If anything, Rivera is going to run a simple/streamlined offense to minimize the impact of a new OC. He really does need to win to stay put. I think the team will do well with some of Chud's "I'M SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU BITCHES" trickery removed.
I want us to be an offensive team and would love to eventually get a smart, o-focused HC but think we'll be better off this season leaning on the strong D Rivera/McDermott built and actually using our RBs more than 8 times per game.
#25
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:28 AM
Every team lost 7 games by a total of 30 points?It's funny because every team in the NFL can say this too.
#26
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:37 AM
I think a lot of the freaking out is because keeping Rivera really only had one large plus - continuity. Now that that plus is gone, we're looking at a scenario where the offense needs to learn possibly two systems in two years.
Agreed. I know that is the reason I was initially bothered by the news. I now reserve judgement until a replacement is named.
#27
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:17 PM
"Same plays by the same director."
#28
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:22 PM
I suspect Rivera will fight hard to get the exact guy for the job that he wants considering his circumstance next year.
#29
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:52 PM
Football is won and lost in the lines....fix those and even a simple offense will work, average receivers get open, and an average d backfield looks better.
We have running backs to run the ball consistently and Newton to run it occasionally.
I don't want Newton taking the same type of beating as everyone's other favorite 'pistol' QB.
#30
Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:02 PM
I'm glad he's gone to be honest...
"Same plays by the same director."
Seems everyone has forgotten that which Cam threw out. I agree, I'm not worried about Chud leaving.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





