The Right to Shoot Tyrants, Not Deer
#17
Posted 14 January 2013 - 03:27 PM
#18
Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:23 PM
I just don't think unfettered access to guns is the greatest of ideas and think that crackpot ideas are just that...crackpot ideas. Guns are fun, but not so much fun that we put their enjoyment above the lives of others.
#19
Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:35 PM
Grew up with guns in the house. Go shooting from time to time at the range. So no, not really. Wouldn't be shocked if I'm a better shot that you.
I just don't think unfettered access to guns is the greatest of ideas and think that crackpot ideas are just that...crackpot ideas. Guns are fun, but not so much fun that we put their enjoyment above the lives of others.
sir, this is america... fun> safety of others.
#20
Posted 14 January 2013 - 08:15 PM
What??? What was the recently signed UN Arms Treaty about, creating better rainbows? I think you're letting your emotions about guns cloud your rational.
There are many many many reasons to distrust the motives of the UN and you are oblivious to ALL of them.
just curious, what "arms treaty" are you talking about? because afaik the senate hasn't ratified any arms treaties recently. did I miss something? are you talking about Obama's administration's backing a draft of a treaty in November that called for discussions in March? did I miss something more?
#21
Posted 14 January 2013 - 08:47 PM
#22
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:03 PM
You just made the list deac.Regarding the thread title, the thought of anyone on this board (self included) deciding who is a tyrant is a nightmare scenario.
#23
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:24 PM
just curious, what "arms treaty" are you talking about? because afaik the senate hasn't ratified any arms treaties recently. did I miss something? are you talking about Obama's administration's backing a draft of a treaty in November that called for discussions in March? did I miss something more?
I think it was signed on July 25th 2012. The huddle was going crazy about it at the time. I'll try to find the thread. The UN treaty required Americans to have no weapons above.38 caliber so grandpa would have to give up the old shotgun. It was quite a big deal.
#24
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:25 PM
The rights fought to the death by millions of Americans, spat on by the security insecure Americans is disgusting.
I.See.Commies.. Disarm for your security..
Snort
#25
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:26 PM
#27
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:40 PM
Author’s Note, 31 July 2012: It appears that, for now, the Arms Trade Treaty is on hold. That doesn’t mean it won’t be pursued in the future, so stay aware.
n fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the U.N. to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”
Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.
If passed by the U.N. and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:
- Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
- CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
- BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
- Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
http://scpatriotsclub.com/blog/?p=82
They tried and failed and are trying to sway public opinion so they can try it again.
#29
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:48 PM
Like I've said I don't own one but I sure as heck don't want anybody to give up theirs.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





